Pfaller Michael A, Carvalhaes Cecilia G, Rhomberg Paul R, Klauer Abigail, Castanheira Mariana
JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 1;11(11):ofae532. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae532. eCollection 2024 Nov.
The activity of isavuconazole and other triazoles against non- (non-AFM) causing invasive aspergillosis was evaluated. A total of 390 non-AFM isolates were collected (1/patient) in 2017-2021 from 41 hospitals. Isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and/or internal spacer region/β-tubulin sequencing and tested by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution. CLSI epidemiological cutoff values were applied, where available. Isavuconazole showed activity against sections (n 122; minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC], 0.5/1 mg/L), (n 57; MIC, 0.5/0.5 mg/L), (n = 34; MIC, 0.12/0.25 mg/L), (n 7; MIC, 1 mg/L), and (n 2; MIC range, 0.12-2 mg/L). Similar activity was displayed by other triazoles against those sections. Most of the isolates from sections (n 9), (n 146), and (n 12) exhibited elevated MIC values to isavuconazole (MIC, 2/-, 2/4, and 2/8 mg/L), voriconazole (MIC, 2/-, 1/2, and 4/8 mg/L), itraconazole (MIC, 2/-, 2/4, and 8/>8 mg/L), and posaconazole (MIC, 0.5/-, 0.5/1, and >8/>8 mg/L), respectively. Isavuconazole was active (MIC values, ≤1 mg/L) against , , , , , , , and , while isavuconazole MIC values between 2 and 8 mg/L were observed against cryptic isolates from section . Isavuconazole inhibited 96.1% of and 80.0% of at ≤4 mg/L, the CLSI wild-type cutoff value for . Voriconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole showed similar activity to isavuconazole against most cryptic species. Isavuconazole exhibited potent in vitro activity against non-AFM; however, the activity of triazoles varies among and within cryptic species.
评估了艾沙康唑和其他三唑类药物对非(非AFM)引起的侵袭性曲霉病的活性。2017年至2021年期间,从41家医院共收集了390株非AFM分离株(每位患者1株)。通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱和/或内部间隔区/β-微管蛋白测序对分离株进行鉴定,并采用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)肉汤微量稀释法进行检测。在可行的情况下应用CLSI流行病学临界值。艾沙康唑对烟曲霉(n = 122;最低抑菌浓度[MIC],0.5/1mg/L)、黄曲霉(n = 57;MIC,0.5/0.5mg/L)、土曲霉(n = 34;MIC,0.12/0.25mg/L)、黑曲霉(n = 7;MIC,1mg/L)和构巢曲霉(n = 2;MIC范围,0.12 - 2mg/L)显示出活性。其他三唑类药物对这些曲霉属也表现出类似活性。来自烟曲霉(n = 9)、黄曲霉(n = 146)和土曲霉(n = 12)的大多数分离株对艾沙康唑(MIC,2/ - 、2/4和2/8mg/L)、伏立康唑(MIC,2/ - 、1/2和4/8mg/L)、伊曲康唑(MIC,2/ - 、2/4和8/>8mg/L)和泊沙康唑(MIC,0.5/ - 、0.5/1和>8/>8mg/L)的MIC值升高。艾沙康唑对米曲霉、棒曲霉、白曲霉、焦曲霉、杂色曲霉、聚多曲霉、土曲霉和构巢曲霉有活性(MIC值≤1mg/L),而对烟曲霉属的隐匿分离株观察到艾沙康唑的MIC值在2至8mg/L之间。在≤4mg/L(CLSI对烟曲霉的野生型临界值)时,艾沙康唑抑制了96.1%的烟曲霉和80.0%的黄曲霉。伏立康唑、伊曲康唑和泊沙康唑对大多数隐匿菌种显示出与艾沙康唑相似的活性。艾沙康唑对非AFM表现出强大的体外活性;然而,三唑类药物的活性在隐匿菌种之间和之内有所不同。