• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学相干断层成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的临床意义:对患者结局的影响。

Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Within Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese PLA Beijing China.

Senior Department of Cardiology Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e033954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033954. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.033954
PMID:39494577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evidence for optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving the prognosis of individuals with in-stent restenosis (ISR) is lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective study enrolled 588 consecutive individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR undergoing PCI from March 2010 to March 2022. Two hundred seven (35.2%) underwent OCT guidance, and 381 (64.8%) underwent angiography guidance. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using survival curves. The primary clinical endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Compared with angiography guidance, OCT guidance demonstrated a higher frequency of drug-coated balloon use and adjunctive therapeutic modalities, including predilation, postdilation, nonslip element balloons, and noncompliant balloons (<0.05). Following PCI, the OCT-guided group achieved a significantly larger minimum lumen diameter (2.36 versus 2.15 mm, <0.001) and a lower percentage diameter stenosis (17% versus 20%, <0.001) than the angiography-guided group. Survival analysis revealed significantly lower 2-year MACEs in the OCT-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group (7% versus 15%, =0.007), validated in the propensity matching analysis (7% versus 15%, =0.001). Multiple sensitivity analyses showed that OCT-guided PCI treatment was an independent protective factor for 2-year MACEs in individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with angiography guidance, OCT guidance is associated with a lower 2-year MACE risk among individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR. Therefore, OCT should be actively considered for guiding PCI treatment in individuals with drug-eluting stent ISR.

REGISTRATION

Url: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03809754.

摘要

背景

光学相干断层扫描(OCT)指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在改善支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者预后方面的证据不足。

方法和结果

本回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受 PCI 治疗的 588 例药物洗脱支架 ISR 连续患者。其中 207 例(35.2%)接受了 OCT 指导,381 例(64.8%)接受了血管造影指导。使用生存曲线分析临床结局。主要临床终点为 2 年主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括全因死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建的复合终点。与血管造影指导相比,OCT 指导下药物涂层球囊使用率和辅助治疗方式(包括预扩张、后扩张、非滑元件球囊和顺应性球囊)更高(<0.05)。PCI 后,OCT 指导组的最小管腔直径明显大于血管造影指导组(2.36 毫米对 2.15 毫米,<0.001),直径狭窄率明显低于血管造影指导组(17%对 20%,<0.001)。生存分析显示,OCT 指导组 2 年 MACE 发生率明显低于血管造影指导组(7%对 15%,=0.007),在倾向评分匹配分析中也得到验证(7%对 15%,=0.001)。多项敏感性分析显示,OCT 指导下的 PCI 治疗是药物洗脱支架 ISR 患者 2 年 MACE 的独立保护因素。

结论

与血管造影指导相比,OCT 指导与药物洗脱支架 ISR 患者 2 年 MACE 风险降低相关。因此,OCT 应积极考虑用于指导药物洗脱支架 ISR 患者的 PCI 治疗。

注册

网址:clinicaltrials.gov。标识符:NCT03809754。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6960/11935681/11d9d1fd7a5f/JAH3-13-e033954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6960/11935681/3dc7ef9b983c/JAH3-13-e033954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6960/11935681/11d9d1fd7a5f/JAH3-13-e033954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6960/11935681/3dc7ef9b983c/JAH3-13-e033954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6960/11935681/11d9d1fd7a5f/JAH3-13-e033954-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Within Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes.光学相干断层成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的临床意义:对患者结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e033954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033954. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Drug-Coated Balloon ESSENTIAL for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.血管造影和光学相干断层扫描对药物涂层球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的评估至关重要。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Apr;21(4):508-513. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.血管成像在常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:金属裸支架和药物洗脱支架试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160.
4
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
5
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Propensity-Matched Cohort of the Thrombectomy Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Alone Trial.光学相干断层成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:血栓切除术与单独经皮冠状动脉介入治疗试验的前瞻性倾向匹配队列。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003414. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003414.
6
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂病变患者(OCCUPI):韩国一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01454-5. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
7
Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials.依维莫司洗脱支架用于裸金属和药物洗脱支架内再狭窄患者:RIBS IV和V试验患者水平汇总分析结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003479.
8
Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与第二代药物洗脱支架置入术治疗药物洗脱支架植入术后支架内再狭窄的比较。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1405-11. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
The OCT-ORION Study: A Randomized Optical Coherence Tomography Study Comparing Resolute Integrity to Biomatrix Drug-Eluting Stent on the Degree of Early Stent Healing and Late Lumen Loss.OCT-ORION 研究:一项比较 Resolute Integrity 与 Biomatrix 药物洗脱支架在早期支架愈合程度和晚期管腔丢失方面的随机光学相干断层扫描研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006034. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006034.
10
3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the RIBS IV Clinical Trial: A Prospective Randomized Study of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Arteries Previously Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents.3 年 RIBS IV 临床试验临床随访:药物洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架治疗后冠状动脉支架内再狭窄患者的前瞻性随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 28;11(10):981-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.037.

本文引用的文献

1
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的Meta 分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Jul;113(7):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02272-7. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Versus De Novo Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内再狭窄与新发病变的结果:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e029300. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029300. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Intravascular Imaging for Guiding In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis Therapy.
血管内影像学在指导支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成治疗中的应用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026492. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.冠状动脉支架再狭窄的血管内成像:预防、特征分析与管理。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 9;9:843734. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843734. eCollection 2022.
5
Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:JACC 最新综述
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 26;80(4):348-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.017.
6
Management of in-stent restenosis.支架内再狭窄的处理。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 3;18(2):e103-e123. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034.
7
Impact of intravascular ultrasound on Outcomes following PErcutaneous coronary interventioN for In-stent Restenosis (iOPEN-ISR study).血管内超声对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内再狭窄(iOPEN-ISR 研究)后结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;340:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
8
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内再狭窄的长期结果。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Aug 6;17(5):e380-e387. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01031.
9
Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对复杂手术患者长期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):607-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.