• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和评估 SEE-Diabetes:一种面向糖尿病护理的以患者为中心的教育决策支持系统。

Developing and Evaluating SEE-Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Educational Decision Support System for Diabetes Care.

机构信息

Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.

Cosmopolitan International Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14234. doi: 10.1111/jep.14234. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1111/jep.14234
PMID:39494699
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This feasibility study evaluated the effectiveness of Support-Engage-Empower-Diabetes (SEE-Diabetes), a patient-centered educational tool designed to promote shared decision-making of diabetes management in older adults. We aimed to assess SEE-Diabetes's ability to facilitate patient engagement and collaborative goal setting, as measured by the Observational Patient Involvement (OPTION) scale and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc). We hypothesized that these instruments would effectively differentiate between healthcare providers who actively leveraged SEE-Diabetes to guide patient-centric conversations and set goals compared to those who did not.

METHODS

SEE-Diabetes, developed through a 4-year user-centered design process, was employed in simulated clinical encounters at the University of Missouri Health Care. We conducted an analysis of 12 clinical encounters using video recordings. This analysis involved three simulated patients and four providers, two internals and two externals, utilizing a mixed-methods approach. We assessed the decision-making process using SEE-Diabetes by SDM-Q-Doc, OPTION scale, and conversation analysis.

RESULTS

The average scores for the SDM-Q-Doc and the OPTION scale, out of a possible 100, were 52.6 and 75.9, respectively. Our findings revealed that active provider engagement with SEE-Diabetes during patient interactions served as an effective medium to facilitate shared decision-making and to set patient-centered goals. Providers who actively utilized SEE-Diabetes to guide conversations, ask open-ended questions, and incorporate patient input into goal setting demonstrated significantly higher OPTION and SDM-Q-Doc scores compared to those who used the tool less frequently or primarily for documentation purposes. Providers expressed positive feedback, highlighting its conciseness, patient-centricity, and optimism about integrating SEE-Diabetes into their future practices.

CONCLUSION

SEE-Diabetes showed considerable promise in improving interactions between patients and providers, presenting an innovative approach to diabetes management for older adults. This tool has the potential to not only close communication gaps but also enable patients to take a more active role in their healthcare decisions.

摘要

目的

本可行性研究评估了支持-参与-授权-糖尿病(SEE-Diabetes)的有效性,这是一种以患者为中心的教育工具,旨在促进老年糖尿病患者管理中的共同决策。我们旨在评估 SEE-Diabetes 通过观察性患者参与(OPTION)量表和共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-Doc)促进患者参与和共同目标设定的能力。我们假设,这些工具将有效地区分积极利用 SEE-Diabetes 指导以患者为中心的对话和设定目标的医疗保健提供者与不这样做的提供者。

方法

通过 4 年的以用户为中心的设计过程开发的 SEE-Diabetes,在密苏里大学卫生保健中心的模拟临床环境中使用。我们对 12 次临床遭遇进行了视频记录分析。这项分析涉及三个模拟患者和四个提供者,两个内部和两个外部,采用混合方法。我们使用 SDM-Q-Doc、OPTION 量表和对话分析评估了 SEE-Diabetes 的决策过程。

结果

SDM-Q-Doc 和 OPTION 量表的平均得分为 52.6 和 75.9(满分 100)。我们的研究结果表明,提供者在患者互动中积极参与 SEE-Diabetes,是促进共同决策和设定以患者为中心的目标的有效媒介。与那些较少或主要出于记录目的使用工具的提供者相比,积极利用 SEE-Diabetes 指导对话、提出开放式问题并将患者的意见纳入目标设定的提供者,其 OPTION 和 SDM-Q-Doc 得分显著更高。提供者表示了积极的反馈,强调了它的简洁性、以患者为中心和对将 SEE-Diabetes 纳入他们未来实践的乐观态度。

结论

SEE-Diabetes 在改善患者与提供者之间的互动方面显示出相当大的前景,为老年糖尿病患者提供了一种创新的管理方法。该工具不仅有可能弥合沟通差距,而且还使患者能够在他们的医疗保健决策中发挥更积极的作用。

相似文献

1
Developing and Evaluating SEE-Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Educational Decision Support System for Diabetes Care.开发和评估 SEE-Diabetes:一种面向糖尿病护理的以患者为中心的教育决策支持系统。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14234. doi: 10.1111/jep.14234. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
6
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
7
Improving shared decision‑making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease, and their parents: an observational post-intervention study.改善儿科血液学家、镰状细胞病患儿及其父母之间的共同决策:一项干预后观察性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 12;184(7):417. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06241-2.
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
10
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Simulation Training on Enhancing Nursing Students' Perceptions to Incorporate Patients' Families Into Treatment Plans: A Randomized Experimental Study.模拟训练对增强护生将患者家属纳入治疗计划认知的影响:一项随机实验研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 26;15(8):e44152. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44152. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
The Use of Simulated Patients Is more Effective than Student Role Playing in Fostering Patient-Centred Attitudes during Communication Skills Training: A Mixed Method Study.使用模拟患者比学生角色扮演在沟通技巧培训中更能有效地培养以患者为中心的态度:一项混合方法研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Dec 17;2022:1498692. doi: 10.1155/2022/1498692. eCollection 2022.
3
13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.
13. 老年人:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S216-S229. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S013.
4
Social determinants of vulnerabilities in type 2 diabetes: a call to action.2型糖尿病易感性的社会决定因素:行动呼吁。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2023 Apr;46(4):841-844. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01952-x. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
SEE-diabetes, a patient-centered diabetes self-management education and support for older adults: Findings and information needs from providers' perspectives.SEE-糖尿病,一种以患者为中心的老年糖尿病自我管理教育和支持:来自提供者视角的发现和信息需求。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep;16(9):102582. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102582. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
6
Electronic Health Record-Based Decision-Making Support in Inpatient Diabetes Management.基于电子健康记录的住院糖尿病管理决策支持。
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Sep;22(9):433-440. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01481-0. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Social Determinants of Health: A Critical Consideration in Diabetes Management.健康的社会决定因素:糖尿病管理中的关键考量
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Spring;40(2):138-139. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0004. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
Complications in Diabetes Mellitus: Social Determinants and Trends.糖尿病并发症:社会决定因素与趋势
Cureus. 2022 Apr 23;14(4):e24415. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24415. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
SEE-Diabetes, a patient-centered diabetes self-management education and support for older adults: Findings and information needs from patients' perspectives.SEE-糖尿病:一项以患者为中心的老年人糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:基于患者视角的研究结果与信息需求
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care-results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial.在初级保健中,针对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的共同决策和以患者为中心-DEBATE 试验的集群随机对照结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 15;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01436-6.