Narindrarangkura Ploypun, Boren Suzanne A, Khan Uzma, Day Margaret, Simoes Eduardo J, Kim Min Soon
University of Missouri Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, 5 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, United States.
University of Missouri Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, 5 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, United States; Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, 5 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, United States.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
This study identified the information needs of people with diabetes aged 65 and older through surveys and focus groups to inform the development of a patient-centered educational decision aid for diabetes care, SEE-Diabetes (Support-Engage-Empower-Diabetes).
We conducted survey (N = 37) and three focus groups (N = 9). The survey collected demographics, diabetes duration, insulin usage, and clinic notes accessibility through a patient portal. In focus groups, participants evaluated the Assessment and Plan section of three selected deidentified clinic notes to assess readability and helpfulness for diabetes care.
The mean age of participants was 66 (24-82, SD = 12), and 22 were female (60%). The mean diabetes duration was 20.9 years (1-63, SD=15). Most participants (80%) read their clinical notes via patient portal. In the focus groups, the readability of clinic notes was noted as a primary concern because of medical abbreviations and poor formatting. Participants found the helpfulness of clinic notes was negatively impacted by vague or insufficient self-care information.
We found the high use of patient portal for reading clinic notes, which offers a use case opportunity for the proposed SEE-Diabetes educational aid. Feedback about the readability and helpfulness of clinic notes will be considered during the design process.
本研究通过调查和焦点小组确定了65岁及以上糖尿病患者的信息需求,以为糖尿病护理的以患者为中心的教育决策辅助工具SEE-Diabetes(支持-参与-赋能-糖尿病)的开发提供信息。
我们进行了调查(N = 37)和三个焦点小组(N = 9)。调查通过患者门户网站收集了人口统计学信息、糖尿病病程、胰岛素使用情况以及临床记录的可获取性。在焦点小组中,参与者评估了三份选定的匿名临床记录的评估和计划部分,以评估其对糖尿病护理的可读性和实用性。
参与者的平均年龄为66岁(24 - 82岁,标准差 = 12),22人为女性(60%)。平均糖尿病病程为20.9年(1 - 63年,标准差 = 15)。大多数参与者(80%)通过患者门户网站阅读他们的临床记录。在焦点小组中,由于医学缩写和格式不佳,临床记录的可读性被视为一个主要问题。参与者发现临床记录的实用性受到自我护理信息模糊或不足的负面影响。
我们发现患者门户网站用于阅读临床记录的使用率很高,这为拟议的SEE-Diabetes教育辅助工具提供了一个用例机会。在设计过程中将考虑有关临床记录可读性和实用性的反馈。