Cohen Zachary D, Breunese Jasmijn, Markowitz John C, Weitz Erica S, Hollon Steven D, Browne Dillon T, Rucci Paola, Corda Carolina, Menchetti Marco, Weissman Myrna M, Bagby R Michael, Quilty Lena C, Blom Marc B J, Altamura Mario, Zobel Ingo, Schramm Elisabeth, Gois Carlos, Twisk Jos W R, Wienicke Frederik J, Cuijpers Pim, Driessen Ellen
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 4;54(14):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001788.
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and antidepressant medications are both first-line interventions for adult depression, but their relative efficacy in the long term and on outcome measures other than depressive symptomatology is unknown. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses can provide more precise effect estimates than conventional meta-analyses. This IPD meta-analysis compared the efficacy of IPT and antidepressants on various outcomes at post-treatment and follow-up (PROSPERO: CRD42020219891). A systematic literature search conducted May 1st, 2023 identified randomized trials comparing IPT and antidepressants in acute-phase treatment of adults with depression. Anonymized IPD were requested and analyzed using mixed-effects models. The prespecified primary outcome was post-treatment depression symptom severity. Secondary outcomes were all post-treatment and follow-up measures assessed in at least two studies. IPD were obtained from 9 of 15 studies identified ( = 1536/1948, 78.9%). No significant comparative treatment effects were found on post-treatment measures of depression ( = 0.088, = 0.103, N = 1530) and social functioning ( = 0.026, = 0.624, = 1213). In smaller samples, antidepressants performed slightly better than IPT on post-treatment measures of general psychopathology ( = 0.276, = 0.023, = 307) and dysfunctional attitudes ( = 0.249, = 0.029, = 231), but not on any other secondary outcomes, nor at follow-up. This IPD meta-analysis is the first to examine the acute and longer-term efficacy of IPT . antidepressants on a broad range of outcomes. Depression treatment trials should routinely include multiple outcome measures and follow-up assessments.
人际心理治疗(IPT)和抗抑郁药物都是成人抑郁症的一线干预措施,但它们在长期疗效以及除抑郁症状学之外的其他结局指标方面的相对疗效尚不清楚。个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析比传统荟萃分析能提供更精确的效应估计。本IPD荟萃分析比较了IPT和抗抑郁药物在治疗后及随访时各种结局的疗效(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42020219891)。2023年5月1日进行的系统文献检索确定了比较IPT和抗抑郁药物治疗成人急性抑郁症的随机试验。我们索取了匿名的IPD并使用混合效应模型进行分析。预先设定的主要结局是治疗后抑郁症状的严重程度。次要结局是在至少两项研究中评估的所有治疗后及随访指标。从15项纳入研究中的9项获取了IPD(n = 1536/1948,78.9%)。在治疗后抑郁(p = 0.088,d = 0.103,N = 1530)和社会功能(p = 0.026,d = 0.624,n = 1213)的测量指标上未发现显著的治疗组间差异。在较小样本中,在治疗后一般精神病理学(p = 0.276,d = 0.023,n = 307)和功能失调性态度(p = 0.249,d = 0.029,n = 231)的测量指标上,抗抑郁药物的表现略优于IPT,但在任何其他次要结局指标以及随访时均未出现这种情况。本IPD荟萃分析首次检验了IPT和抗抑郁药物在广泛结局指标上的急性和长期疗效。抑郁症治疗试验应常规纳入多个结局指标和随访评估。