• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The efficacy of antidepressant medication and interpersonal psychotherapy for adult acute-phase depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗抑郁药物和人际心理治疗对成人急性期抑郁症的疗效:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案
BJPsych Open. 2021 Feb 19;7(2):e56. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.4.
2
Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.认知疗法与行为激活对成年抑郁症患者的疗效及调节因素:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 10;8(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.560.
3
Which patients benefit specifically from short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) for depression? Study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.哪些患者能从抑郁症的短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)中特别受益?个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 20;8(2):e018900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018900.
4
Towards personalising treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of face-to-face efficacy moderators of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for major depressive disorder.朝向个体化治疗:针对重性抑郁障碍的认知行为疗法和人际心理治疗的面对面疗效调节因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Dec;49(16):2657-2668. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002812. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Which patients benefit from adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to antidepressants in the treatment of depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.哪些患者在抗抑郁药物治疗的基础上联合短期精神动力学心理治疗能获益?一项基于个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(13):6090-6101. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003270. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of psychological relapse prevention interventions versus control for patients in remission from depression: a protocol.对抑郁症缓解患者的心理复发预防干预与对照的个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析:方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034158.
7
The efficacy of adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.在抑郁症治疗中,抗抑郁药联合短期心理动力心理治疗的疗效:个体参与者数据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Aug;80:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101886. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Efficacy and moderators of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.抑郁症短期心理动力疗法的疗效及调节因素:个体参与者数据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr;101:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102269. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Unveiling mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: Study protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.揭示抑郁症数字干预的变化机制:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析的研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 3;13:899115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899115. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a multivariable prediction model to support personalized selection among five major empirically-supported treatments for adult depression. Study protocol of a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis.开发一个多变量预测模型,以支持在成人抑郁症的五种主要经验支持治疗方法中进行个性化选择。一项系统评价和个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0322124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322124. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of size of capsulorhexis on the outcome of cataract surgery: a protocol for systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.连续环形撕囊大小对白内障手术结果的影响:系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e092002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092002.
3
Comparative efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressant medication for adult depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.人际心理治疗与抗抑郁药物治疗成人抑郁症的疗效比较:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 4;54(14):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001788.
4
Efficacy of psychotherapy in subthreshold depression patients: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.阈下抑郁患者心理治疗的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析概述的方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;10:1017907. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017907. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.认知疗法与行为激活对成年抑郁症患者的疗效及调节因素:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 10;8(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.560.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.在抑郁症治疗中,抗抑郁药联合短期心理动力心理治疗的疗效:个体参与者数据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Aug;80:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101886. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression.心理治疗、药物治疗及其联合应用对成人抑郁症治疗效果的网状Meta分析。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):92-107. doi: 10.1002/wps.20701.
3
Translating the BDI and BDI-II into the HAMD and vice versa with equipercentile linking.用等百分位链接将 BDI 和 BDI-II 翻译成 HAMD 及反之。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Mar 14;29:e24. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000088.
4
Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy, Drug, or Their Combination for Persistent Depressive Disorder: Personalizing the Treatment Choice Using Individual Participant Data Network Metaregression.认知行为分析系统的心理治疗、药物或其组合对持续性抑郁障碍的治疗:使用个体参与者数据网络荟萃回归对治疗选择进行个体化。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(3):140-153. doi: 10.1159/000489227. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials.在随机对照试验中估计治疗效果的不同方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Mar 28;10:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Which patients benefit specifically from short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) for depression? Study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.哪些患者能从抑郁症的短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)中特别受益?个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 20;8(2):e018900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018900.
7
Individual patient data meta-analysis of combined treatments versus psychotherapy (with or without pill placebo), pharmacotherapy or pill placebo for adult depression: a protocol.成人抑郁症联合治疗与心理治疗(有无药物安慰剂)、药物治疗或药物安慰剂对比的个体患者数据荟萃分析:方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 13;7(2):e013478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013478.
8
Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.使用个体参与者数据的Meta分析:单阶段和两阶段方法及其差异原因。
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):855-875. doi: 10.1002/sim.7141. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
9
Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Mental Health Problems: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.心理健康问题的人际心理治疗:综合荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;173(7):680-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091141. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) for Depression in Primary Care.基层医疗中抑郁症的人际咨询(IPC)
Am J Psychother. 2014;68(4):359-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.4.359.

抗抑郁药物和人际心理治疗对成人急性期抑郁症的疗效:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案

The efficacy of antidepressant medication and interpersonal psychotherapy for adult acute-phase depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

作者信息

Driessen Ellen, Cohen Zachary D, Weissman Myrna M, Markowitz John C, Weitz Erica S, Hollon Steven D, Browne Dillon T, Rucci Paola, Corda Carolina, Menchetti Marco, Bagby R Michael, Quilty Lena C, O'Hara Michael W, Zlotnick Caron, Pearlstein Teri, Blom Marc B J, Altamura Mario, Gois Carlos, Schneider Lon S, Twisk Jos W R, Cuijpers Pim

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, the Netherlands; and Depression Expertise Center, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2021 Feb 19;7(2):e56. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.4.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2021.4
PMID:
33602371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8058821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antidepressant medication and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) are both recommended interventions in depression treatment guidelines based on literature reviews and meta-analyses. However, 'conventional' meta-analyses comparing their efficacy are limited by their reliance on reported study-level information and a narrow focus on depression outcome measures assessed at treatment completion. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, considered the gold standard in evidence synthesis, can improve the quality of the analyses when compared with conventional meta-analysis.

AIMS

We describe the protocol for a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of antidepressants and IPT for adult acute-phase depression across a range of outcome measures, including depressive symptom severity as well as functioning and well-being, at both post-treatment and follow-up (PROSPERO: CRD42020219891).

METHOD

We will conduct a systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised clinical trials comparing antidepressants and IPT in the acute-phase treatment of adults with depression. We will invite the authors of these studies to share the participant-level data of their trials. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be conducted using mixed-effects models to assess treatment effects at post-treatment and follow-up for all outcome measures that are assessed in at least two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This will be the first IPD meta-analysis examining antidepressants versus IPT efficacy. This study has the potential to enhance our knowledge of depression treatment by comparing the short- and long-term effects of two widely used interventions across a range of outcome measures using state-of-the-art statistical techniques.

摘要

背景

基于文献综述和荟萃分析,抗抑郁药物和人际心理治疗(IPT)均为抑郁症治疗指南中推荐的干预措施。然而,比较二者疗效的“传统”荟萃分析存在局限性,因为它们依赖所报告的研究层面信息,且仅狭隘地关注治疗结束时评估的抑郁结局指标。个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析被视为证据综合的金标准,与传统荟萃分析相比,它可以提高分析质量。

目的

我们描述了一项系统评价和IPD荟萃分析的方案,该分析将比较抗抑郁药和IPT在一系列结局指标上对成人急性期抑郁症的疗效,这些指标包括治疗后及随访时的抑郁症状严重程度、功能状况和幸福感(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42020219891)。

方法

我们将在PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统的文献检索,以识别比较抗抑郁药和IPT在成人抑郁症急性期治疗中的随机临床试验。我们将邀请这些研究的作者分享其试验的参与者层面数据。将使用混合效应模型进行单阶段IPD荟萃分析,以评估至少在两项研究中评估的所有结局指标在治疗后及随访时的治疗效果。

结论

这将是第一项比较抗抑郁药与IPT疗效的IPD荟萃分析。本研究有可能通过使用最先进的统计技术,比较两种广泛使用的干预措施在一系列结局指标上的短期和长期效果,从而增强我们对抑郁症治疗的认识。