Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, Germany.
Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Marburg, Germany.
J Vis. 2024 Nov 4;24(12):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.12.2.
Serial dependence effects have been observed across a wide range of perceptual and oculomotor tasks. This opens up the question of whether these effects observed share underlying mechanisms. Here we measured serial dependence effects in a semipredictable environment for the same group of observers across four different tasks, two perceptual (color and orientation judgments) and two oculomotor (tracking moving targets and the pupil light reflex). By leveraging individual differences, we searched for links in the magnitude of serial dependence effects across the different tasks. On the group level, we observed significant attractive serial dependence effects for all tasks, except the pupil response. The rare absence of a serial dependence effect for the reflex-like pupil light response suggests that sequential effects require cortical processing or even higher-level cognition. For the tasks with significant serial dependence effects, there was substantial and reliable variance in the magnitude of the sequential effects. We observed a significant relationship in the strength of serial dependence for the two perceptual tasks, but no relation between the perceptual tasks and oculomotor tracking. This emphasizes differences in processing between perception and oculomotor control. The lack of a correlation across all tasks indicates that it is unlikely that the relation between the individual differences in the magnitude of serial dependence is driven by more general mechanisms related to for example working memory. It suggests that there are other shared perceptual or decisional mechanisms for serial dependence effects across different low-level perceptual tasks.
在广泛的感知和眼球运动任务中都观察到了序列依赖效应。这就提出了一个问题,即这些观察到的效应是否具有共同的潜在机制。在这里,我们在一个半可预测的环境中,对同一组观察者在四个不同的任务(颜色和方向判断、跟踪移动目标和瞳孔光反射)中测量了序列依赖效应。通过利用个体差异,我们在不同任务中寻找序列依赖效应大小的联系。在群体水平上,我们观察到所有任务(除了瞳孔反应)都存在显著的吸引性序列依赖效应。反射样的瞳孔光反应很少出现序列依赖效应,这表明顺序效应需要皮质处理甚至更高层次的认知。对于具有显著序列依赖效应的任务,序列效应的幅度存在很大且可靠的差异。我们观察到两个感知任务之间的序列依赖强度存在显著关系,但感知任务和眼球运动跟踪之间没有关系。这强调了感知和眼球运动控制之间处理的差异。在所有任务中都没有相关性表明,个体差异在序列依赖幅度上的关系不太可能是由与工作记忆等更一般机制相关的关系驱动的。这表明,在不同的低水平感知任务中,存在其他共享的感知或决策机制来产生序列依赖效应。