• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算机的心理教育自助平台对饮食失调症的有效性(有无相关应用程序):系统评价方案。

Effectiveness of Computer-Based Psychoeducational Self-Help Platforms for Eating Disorders (With or Without an Associated App): Protocol for a Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 4;13:e60165. doi: 10.2196/60165.

DOI:10.2196/60165
PMID:39495557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574503/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to psychological health care is extremely difficult, especially for individuals with severely stigmatized disorders such as eating disorders (EDs). There has been an increase in children, adolescents, and adults with ED symptoms and ED, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Computer-based self-help platforms (± associated apps) allow people to bridge the treatment gap and receive support when in-person treatment is unavailable or not preferred.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-based self-help platforms for EDs, some of which may have associated apps.

METHODS

The proposed systematic review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. This review will report and evaluate the literature concerning the efficacy of self-help platforms for EDs. Articles were obtained from the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and APA PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria included research with original data and gray literature; research evaluating the efficacy of web-based psychoeducational self-help platforms for EDs; people with an ED diagnosis, ED symptoms, at risk of developing EDs, or from the general population without ED-related behaviors; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention clinical outcome of ED symptoms; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention associated mental health difficulties; and literature in English. The exclusion criteria were solely guided self-help platforms, only in-person interventions with no computer-based ± associated apps comparison group, only in-person-delivered CBT, self-help platforms for conditions other than eating disorders, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, posters, leaflets, books, reviews, and research that only reported physical outcomes. Two independent authors used the search terms to conduct the initial search. The collated articles then were screened by their titles and abstracts, and finally, full-text screenings were conducted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool will be used to assess the risks of bias in the included studies. Data extraction will be conducted, included studies will undergo narrative synthesis, and results will be presented in tables. The systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

RESULTS

The authors conducted a database search for articles published by May 31, 2024. In total, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. Data charting, synthesis, and analysis were completed in Microsoft Excel by the end of July 2024. Results will be grouped based on the intervention stages. The results are expected to be published by the end of 2024. Overall, the systematic review found that computer-based self-help platforms are effective in reducing global ED psychopathology and ED-related behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-help platforms are helpful first-stage resource in a tiered health care system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024520866; https://tinyurl.com/5ys2unsw.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60165.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/11574503/f8feffea7003/resprot_v13i1e60165_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/11574503/f8feffea7003/resprot_v13i1e60165_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/11574503/f8feffea7003/resprot_v13i1e60165_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

获得心理健康护理极其困难,尤其是对于那些患有严重污名化障碍(如饮食障碍)的个体而言。自 COVID-19 大流行以来,患有饮食障碍症状和饮食障碍的儿童、青少年和成年人数量有所增加。基于计算机的自助平台(±相关应用程序)允许人们在无法获得或不倾向于获得面对面治疗时,弥补治疗差距并获得支持。

目的

本系统评价旨在评估针对饮食障碍的基于计算机的自助平台的有效性,其中一些可能具有相关应用程序。

方法

拟议的系统评价将遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。本综述将报告和评估有关饮食障碍自助平台功效的文献。文章从 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、全球健康和 APA PsycInfo 中获得。纳入标准包括具有原始数据和灰色文献的研究;评估基于网络的心理教育自助平台对饮食障碍疗效的研究;有饮食障碍诊断、饮食障碍症状、有发展为饮食障碍风险或来自无饮食障碍相关行为的一般人群的人群;基于计算机的±相关应用程序干预前后饮食障碍症状的临床结局;基于计算机的±相关应用程序干预前后相关心理健康困难;以及英语文献。排除标准为仅指导自助平台、仅有无基于计算机的±相关应用程序比较组的面对面干预、仅提供面对面 CBT、用于除饮食障碍以外的其他疾病的自助平台、系统评价、荟萃分析、海报、传单、书籍、综述以及仅报告身体结果的研究。两位独立作者使用搜索词进行初步搜索。然后,根据标题和摘要筛选整理后的文章,最后进行全文筛选。将使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚 2 工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。将进行数据提取,纳入的研究将进行叙述性综合,结果将以表格形式呈现。该系统评价将提交给同行评议期刊。

结果

作者于 2024 年 5 月 31 日之前进行了数据库搜索,以搜索已发表的文章。共有 14 项研究被纳入系统评价。到 2024 年 7 月底完成数据图表、综合和分析。结果将根据干预阶段进行分组。预计结果将于 2024 年底公布。总的来说,系统评价发现,基于计算机的自助平台在减少全球饮食障碍心理病理学和与饮食障碍相关的行为方面是有效的。

结论

自助平台是分层医疗保健系统中有用的第一阶段资源。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42024520866;https://tinyurl.com/5ys2unsw。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/60165。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Computer-Based Psychoeducational Self-Help Platforms for Eating Disorders (With or Without an Associated App): Protocol for a Systematic Review.基于计算机的心理教育自助平台对饮食失调症的有效性(有无相关应用程序):系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 4;13:e60165. doi: 10.2196/60165.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Effectiveness of Mobile App Interventions to Improve Periodontal Health: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.移动应用程序干预措施改善牙周健康的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 31;13:e50479. doi: 10.2196/50479.
5
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.减少青少年抑郁症状和酒精使用的移动应用程序:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma.用于哮喘的智能手机和平板电脑自我管理应用程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Web-Based Fully Automated Self-Help With Different Levels of Therapist Support for Individuals With Eating Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的针对有饮食失调症状个体的不同程度治疗师支持的全自动自助:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 17;18(6):e159. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5709.
9
Psychoeducational Burnout Intervention for Nurses: Protocol for a Systematic Review.护士心理教育性耗竭干预:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 30;13:e58692. doi: 10.2196/58692.
10
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of unguided internet-based computer self-help platforms for eating disorders (with or without an associated app): A systematic review.基于互联网的无指导计算机自助平台对饮食失调症(无论是否配有相关应用程序)的有效性:一项系统评价。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 23;4(4):e0000684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000684. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of psychoeducation for children, adolescents and caregivers in the treatment of eating disorders: A systematic review.心理教育对儿童、青少年及其照顾者治疗饮食失调症的有效性:一项系统评价。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Jan;32(1):99-115. doi: 10.1002/erv.3028. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Worldwide prevalence of DSM-5 eating disorders among young people.全球年轻人中 DSM-5 进食障碍的患病率。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1;35(6):362-371. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000818. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Eating disorder behaviors as predictors of suicidal ideation among people with an eating disorder.
进食障碍行为对进食障碍患者自杀意念的预测作用。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Oct;55(10):1352-1360. doi: 10.1002/eat.23770. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Understanding treatment delay: Perceived barriers preventing treatment-seeking for eating disorders.理解治疗延迟:阻碍寻求进食障碍治疗的感知障碍。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;56(3):248-259. doi: 10.1177/00048674211020102. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Medical Admissions Among Adolescents With Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎疫情期间青少年进食障碍患者的医疗准入情况。
Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052201. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
COVID-19 and eating disorders in young people.新冠病毒与年轻人的饮食失调问题
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 May;5(5):316-318. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00094-8.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Break Binge Eating: Reach, engagement, and user profile of an Internet-based psychoeducational and self-help platform for eating disorders.打破暴食:基于互联网的饮食障碍心理教育和自助平台的覆盖范围、参与度和用户特征。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Oct;53(10):1719-1728. doi: 10.1002/eat.23356. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Evaluating the role of digital intervention design in treatment outcomes and adherence to eTherapy programs for eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估数字干预设计在治疗结果和对饮食障碍电子治疗方案的依从性方面的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 Oct;52(10):1077-1094. doi: 10.1002/eat.23131. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Self-Help Treatment of Eating Disorders.自助治疗进食障碍。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2019 Jun;42(2):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 3.