Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情带来的警示教训:医疗系统努力应对提供新冠治疗和非新冠治疗的双重责任。

Cautionary lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Healthcare systems grappled with the dual responsibility of delivering COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 care.

作者信息

Duggal Bhanu, Kapoor Anuva, Duggal Mona, Maria Kangan, Rayapati Vasuki, Chourase Mithlesh, Kumar Mukesh, Saunik Sujata, Gedam Praveen, Subramanian Lakshminarayanan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Community and Family Medicine Resident, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, India.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;4(11):e0002035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002035. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals were challenged to provide both COVID-19 and non-COVID treatment. A survey questionnaire was designed and distributed via email to hospitals empanelled under the Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana(AB-PMJAY), the world's largest National Health Insurance Scheme. Telephonic follow-ups were used to ensure participation in places with inadequate internet. We applied support vector regression to quantify the hospital variables that affected the use vs. non-use of hospital services (Model-1), and factors impacting COVID-19 revenue and staffing levels (Model-2).We quantified the statistical significance of important input variables using Fisher's exact test. The survey, conducted early in the pandemic, included 461 hospitals across 20 states and union territories. Only 55.5% of hospitals were delivering emergency care, 26.7% were doing elective surgery and 36.7% providing obstetric services. Hospitals with adequate supplies of PPE, including N95 masks, and separate facilities designated for COVID-19 patients were more likely to continue providing emergency surgeries and services effectively. Data analysis revealed that large hospitals (> 250 beds) with adequate PPE and dedicated COVID-19 facilities continued both emergency and elective surgeries. Public hospitals were key in pandemic management, large private hospital systems were more likely to conduct non-COVID-19 surgeries, with not-for-profit hospitals performing slightly better. Public and large private not-for-profit hospitals faced fewer staff shortages and revenue declines. In contrast, smaller hospitals (< 50 beds) experienced significant staff attrition due to anxiety, stress and revenue losses. They requested government support for PPE supplies, staff training, testing kits, and special allowances for healthcare workers. The inclusion of COVID-19 coverage under AB-PMJAY improved access to healthcare for critical cases. Maintaining non-COVID-19 care during the pandemic indicates healthcare system resiliency. A state-wide data-driven system for ventilators, beds, and funding support for smaller hospitals, would improve patient care access and collaboration.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,医院面临着既要提供新冠治疗又要提供非新冠治疗的挑战。设计了一份调查问卷,并通过电子邮件分发给纳入阿育吠陀·巴拉特-总理全民健康保险计划(AB-PMJAY)的医院,该计划是世界上最大的国家健康保险计划。对于网络条件不足的地方,采用电话随访以确保参与调查。我们应用支持向量回归来量化影响医院服务使用与否的医院变量(模型1),以及影响新冠收入和人员配备水平的因素(模型2)。我们使用费舍尔精确检验来量化重要输入变量的统计显著性。这项在疫情早期进行的调查涵盖了20个邦和联邦属地的461家医院。只有55.5%的医院提供急诊护理,26.7%的医院进行择期手术,36.7%的医院提供产科服务。拥有包括N95口罩在内的充足个人防护装备供应以及为新冠患者指定的单独设施的医院,更有可能继续有效地提供急诊手术和服务。数据分析显示,拥有充足个人防护装备和专门新冠设施的大型医院(>250张床位)继续进行急诊和择期手术。公立医院是疫情管理的关键,大型私立医院系统更有可能进行非新冠手术,非营利性医院表现稍好。公立和大型私立非营利性医院面临的人员短缺和收入下降较少。相比之下,小型医院(<50张床位)由于焦虑、压力和收入损失而出现了严重的人员流失。他们请求政府在个人防护装备供应、人员培训、检测试剂盒以及医护人员特殊津贴方面提供支持。将新冠保险纳入AB-PMJAY改善了危急病例获得医疗服务的机会。在疫情期间维持非新冠护理表明了医疗系统的韧性。一个针对小型医院的全州范围的呼吸机、床位和资金支持的数据驱动系统,将改善患者获得医疗服务的机会和协作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab79/11534245/bf85b7e5b45e/pgph.0002035.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验