Lin Jui-Yu, Peng Xiang, Lin Chuan-Yuan
Li-An Medical Clinic, 4F., No. 267, Lequn 2nd Rd., Zhongshan District, Taipei City, 104452, Taiwan.
Chenxi Medical Aesthetics Group, Shanghai, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04487-z.
Biostimulators have been increasingly popular for facial rejuvenation in recent years. Among them, Sculptra (based on poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA)) and AestheFill (based on poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA)) are supplied as lyophilized powders in vials. Both need to be reconstituted with sterile water into homogeneous suspensions before injection. However, there are some differences in their reconstitution processes. This article compares the reconstitution processes of Sculptra and AestheFill.No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
近年来，生物刺激剂在面部年轻化方面越来越受欢迎。其中，塑然雅（基于聚左旋乳酸（PLLA））和爱塑美（基于聚-D,L-乳酸（PDLLA））以冻干粉末形式装在小瓶中提供。两者在注射前都需要用无菌水复溶成均匀的悬浮液。然而，它们的复溶过程存在一些差异。本文比较了塑然雅和爱塑美的复溶过程。未指定证据级别 本期刊要求作者为每篇适用循证医学排名的投稿指定证据级别。这排除了综述文章、书评以及涉及基础科学、动物研究、尸体研究和实验研究的手稿。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参考目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。
