Pang Yuan, Tse Barry, Liu Wen, Yang Qian
Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
School of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cogn Process. 2025 May;26(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01246-5. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal have been recognized as two useful ways to regulate emotions. The former tends to cultivate an attitude of being open and accepting of emotional events; whereas the latter involves a top-down process of re-interpreting emotional events. However, it is unclear how mindfulness influences cognitive reappraisal. Hence, the current study mainly addressed this research issue by exploring the mediating role of emotional and interoceptive awareness. 372 participants were asked to report dispositional mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal, emotional awareness, and interoceptive awareness by means of corresponding questionnaires. First, we performed the Pearson Correlations among the four factors, then assessed the mediating role of emotional awareness and interoceptive awareness in the link between mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal in separated models. Last, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to investigate the link when both emotional and interoceptive awareness acted as the mediating variables. Results showed that mindfulness was negatively correlated with cognitive reappraisal, emotional awareness, and interoceptive awareness; whereas emotional awareness, interoceptive awareness, and cognitive reappraisal were positively correlated with each other. Moreover, increased mindfulness had a significantly negative effect on cognitive reappraisal, by reducing emotional and interoceptive awareness separately or successively. Except for the No-worrying factor, the remaining seven factors of interoceptive awareness were significantly loaded onto the latent variable. The result reveals the negative relationship between mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal. This link is mediated by one's emotional awareness and interoceptive awareness independently or successively, which may reflect the intensity of externally-emotional reactivity that signify the need to regulate emotions by means of cognitive reappraisal.
正念和认知重评已被公认为调节情绪的两种有效方式。前者倾向于培养一种对情绪事件开放和接纳的态度;而后者则涉及对情绪事件进行重新解释的自上而下的过程。然而,目前尚不清楚正念如何影响认知重评。因此,本研究主要通过探讨情绪觉知和内感受觉知的中介作用来解决这一研究问题。372名参与者被要求通过相应问卷报告特质正念、认知重评、情绪觉知和内感受觉知。首先,我们对这四个因素进行了皮尔逊相关性分析,然后在单独的模型中评估情绪觉知和内感受觉知在正念与认知重评之间联系中的中介作用。最后,我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)来研究当情绪觉知和内感受觉知同时作为中介变量时的联系。结果表明,正念与认知重评、情绪觉知和内感受觉知呈负相关;而情绪觉知、内感受觉知和认知重评之间呈正相关。此外,正念的增加通过分别或相继降低情绪觉知和内感受觉知,对认知重评产生显著的负向影响。除了“无忧”因素外,内感受觉知的其余七个因素均显著加载到潜在变量上。该结果揭示了正念与认知重评之间的负向关系。这种联系由个体的情绪觉知和内感受觉知独立或相继介导,这可能反映了外部情绪反应的强度,表明需要通过认知重评来调节情绪。