Suppr超能文献

南加州青少年中感知到的邻里混乱与物质使用行为及零售渠道的关联

Association of Perceived Neighborhood Disorder with Substance Use Behaviors and Retail Access Among Southern California Adolescents.

作者信息

Harlow Alyssa F, Hughes Halbert Chanita, Ranker Lynsie R, Cho Junhan, Thompson Laura K, Cockburn Myles, Eckel Sandrah P, Barrington-Trimis Jessica L

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Institute for Addiction Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(2):228-235. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2422972. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with a higher concentration of tobacco, cannabis and alcohol retailers and greater risk of certain substance use behaviors among youth. Less is known about the impact of subjective neighborhood disorder, which captures distinct exposures that may be relevant to substance use outcomes, including neighborhood social processes, safety, physical characteristics, and neighborhood drug use.

METHODS

Data are from two waves (Feb-Dec 2022) of a prospective cohort of Southern California high school students ( = 2,139; mean[SD] age = 15.7.[0.6]). We examined associations of perceived neighborhood disorder at baseline with (a) perceived ease of purchase (continuous scale 0-100) for alcohol, cannabis, e-cigarettes, cigarettes, hookah, cigars/cigarillos, and oral nicotine at baseline and follow-up, and (b) repeated measures of past 6-month and past-30-day alcohol, vaped cannabis, smoked cannabis, cannabis edibles, e-cigarette, cigarette, cigarillo, hookah, and oral nicotine use.

RESULTS

E-cigarettes were perceived to be the easiest product to purchase. Participants in the highest (vs. lowest) quartile of neighborhood disorder reported greater mean ease of purchasing scores for all products (mean difference range = 5.43 [95%CI: 1.64-9.21] for mint/menthol oral nicotine products to 9.40 [95%CI: 6.16-12.64] for hookah) and greater odds of e-cigarette, smoked cannabis, edibles, vaped THC, and alcohol use (odds ratio range = 1.52 [95%CI: 1.05 to 2.18] for past 6-month alcohol to 5.40 [95% CI: 3.46 to 8.42] for 30-day smoked cannabis).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions that shape youth perceptions of their neighborhood and reduce youth retail access in disadvantaged neighborhoods are needed and may help to prevent youth substance use.

摘要

背景

社区劣势与烟草、大麻和酒精零售商的高集中度以及青少年某些物质使用行为的更高风险相关。关于主观社区混乱的影响知之甚少,主观社区混乱涵盖了可能与物质使用结果相关的不同暴露因素,包括社区社会过程、安全、物理特征和社区吸毒情况。

方法

数据来自南加州高中生前瞻性队列的两波调查(2022年2月至12月)(n = 2139;平均[标准差]年龄 = 15.7[0.6])。我们研究了基线时感知到的社区混乱与以下方面的关联:(a)基线和随访时酒精、大麻、电子烟、香烟、水烟、雪茄/小雪茄和口服尼古丁的感知购买便利性(连续量表0 - 100),以及(b)过去6个月和过去30天酒精、雾化大麻、吸食大麻、大麻食品、电子烟、香烟、小雪茄、水烟和口服尼古丁使用的重复测量。

结果

电子烟被认为是最容易购买的产品。社区混乱程度最高(与最低)四分位数的参与者报告称,所有产品的平均购买便利性得分更高(薄荷/薄荷醇口服尼古丁产品的平均差异范围 = 5.43[95%置信区间:1.64 - 9.21],水烟为9.40[95%置信区间:6.16 - 12.64]),电子烟、吸食大麻、食品、雾化四氢大麻酚和酒精使用的几率也更高(过去6个月酒精使用的优势比范围 = 1.52[95%置信区间:1.05至2.18],30天吸食大麻为5.40[95%置信区间:3.46至8.42])。

结论

需要采取干预措施来塑造青少年对其社区的认知,并减少弱势社区青少年的零售渠道,这可能有助于预防青少年物质使用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验