• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否需要进行尺神经前置术治疗创伤后肘僵硬?一项回顾性研究。

Is anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve necessary for post-traumatic elbow stiffness? A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, No. 324 Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, No. 324 Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 5;19(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05220-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05220-x
PMID:39497191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11536545/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is necessary in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of 177 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness treated at Shandong Provincial Hospital from 1 January 2012 to 31 October 2022. Sixty-one patients presented with ulnar nerve symptoms, and 116 patients had no nerve symptoms. Outcomes between patients with and without symptoms were compared using a range of clinical measures, namely range of motion (ROM), ulnar nerve symptoms, and various standardized scoring systems, namely, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), visual analog scale (VAS), improved Broberg and Morrey Score (BMS), Quick disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Amadio score.

RESULTS

Open elbow release surgery significantly improved elbow joint function in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness, regardless of the presence of ulnar nerve symptoms. Patients with ulnar nerve symptoms showed significant improvement after anterior transposition compared with in situ release. For patients without ulnar nerve symptoms, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two types of ulnar nerve surgery.

CONCLUSION

Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is preferable for patients with ulnar nerve symptoms, while the choice between anterior transposition and in situ release can be individualized for patients without symptoms, based on intraoperative findings.

摘要

目的

探讨外伤性肘僵硬患者是否需要行尺神经前置。

方法

回顾性分析 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 31 日山东省立医院收治的 177 例外伤性肘僵硬患者的临床资料。61 例患者出现尺神经症状,116 例患者无神经症状。比较两组患者的临床疗效,包括活动度、尺神经症状、Mayo 肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、改良 Broberg 和 Morrey 评分(BMS)、Quick-DASH 评分、牛津肘关节评分(OES)、Amadio 评分等。

结果

开放性肘松解术可明显改善外伤性肘僵硬患者的肘关节功能,无论是否存在尺神经症状。与原位松解相比,有尺神经症状的患者行尺神经前置后功能改善明显。对于无尺神经症状的患者,两种尺神经手术方式的疗效无显著差异。

结论

对于有尺神经症状的患者,行尺神经前置术较好;对于无尺神经症状的患者,可根据术中发现选择尺神经前置或原位松解。

相似文献

1
Is anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve necessary for post-traumatic elbow stiffness? A retrospective study.是否需要进行尺神经前置术治疗创伤后肘僵硬?一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 5;19(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05220-x.
2
Ulnar neuritis after open elbow arthrolysis combined with ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: outcome and risk factors.开放性肘关节松解术联合尺神经皮下移位治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬后的尺神经炎:疗效及危险因素
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Is routine ulnar nerve transposition necessary in open release of stiff elbows? Our experience and a literature review.在僵硬肘关节的切开松解术中常规进行尺神经转位是否必要?我们的经验及文献综述。
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2289-94. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2465-0. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
4
Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve Affects Elbow Range of Motion: A Mean 13.5 Years of Follow-up.尺神经皮下前置术对肘部活动范围的影响:平均随访 13.5 年。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Feb 5;131(3):282-288. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.223851.
5
[Is anterior transposition of ulnar nerve beneficial during open reduction and internal fixation for intercondylar humerus fractures].[尺神经前置在肱骨髁间骨折切开复位内固定术中是否有益]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Apr 25;32(4):296-301. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.04.002.
6
What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?铰链式外固定器开放性关节松解术后严重创伤后肘僵硬的活动范围和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2319-2328. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000726.
7
[OPEN ARTHROLYSIS COMBINED WITH INTERNAL FIXATOR REMOVAL FOR POST-TRAUMATIC ELBOW STIFFNESS].[切开松解联合内固定取出治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;29(7):826-30.
8
Efficacy of combined osteotomy and ulnar nerve transposition for cubitus valgus with ulnar nerve palsy in adults.成人肘内翻伴尺神经麻痹行联合截骨与尺神经转位的疗效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3244-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3057-9. Epub 2013 May 11.
9
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?肘部三联征损伤:是否需要固定喙突?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7.
10
Triple management of cubitus valgus deformity complicating neglected nonunion of fractures of lateral humeral condyle in children: a case series.儿童肱骨外侧髁骨折陈旧性骨不连并发肘外翻畸形的三联治疗:病例系列
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3709-6. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Open elbow arthrolysis with hinged external fixation for postburn elbow stiffness: a case series with an averaged 4-year follow-up.采用带铰链外固定的开放性肘关节松解术治疗烧伤后肘关节僵硬:一项平均随访4年的病例系列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 12;20(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06155-7.
2
Bone transport combined with internal fixation in post-traumatic distal humerus defects and nonunions: retrospective analysis of 16 patients.骨搬运联合内固定治疗创伤后肱骨远端缺损及骨不连:16例患者的回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 25;20(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06058-7.
3
Novel Clinical Insights into the Pathogenesis of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness: An Expression Profile Analysis of Contracted Joint Capsule in Human.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification of elbow stiffness.肘关节僵硬的分类。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Apr;9(2):234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
2
In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression Alone for Distal Humerus Fractures Minimizes Iatrogenic Injury.单纯原位尺神经减压治疗肱骨远端骨折可将医源性损伤降至最低。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 May 1;37(5):e233-e234. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002589.
3
Elbow Arthritis.肘关节炎。
创伤后肘关节僵硬发病机制的新临床见解:人类挛缩关节囊的表达谱分析
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jan 6;18:167-182. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S499986. eCollection 2025.
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jun;48(6):603-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Early Joint Use Following Elbow Dislocation Limits Range-of-Motion Loss and Tissue Pathology in Posttraumatic Joint Contracture.早期联合使用治疗肘关节脱位可限制创伤后关节挛缩的活动范围丧失和组织病理学改变。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 1;105(3):223-230. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00064. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
5
Efficacy and safety of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for distal humerus fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.尺神经前置术治疗肱骨远端骨折的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1005200. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005200. eCollection 2022.
6
Dynamic analysis of the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel morphology using ultrasonography: a cadaveric study.超声检查对尺神经和肘管形态的动态分析:尸体研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Nov;31(11):2322-2327. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
Ulnar nerve decompression with osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary elbow osteoarthritis.尺神经减压联合骨囊成形术治疗原发性肘关节炎。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 May-Aug;30(2):10225536221109914. doi: 10.1177/10225536221109914.
8
Clinical results of a 10-year follow-up of surgical treatment for elbow stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis: A case series.类风湿关节炎肘部僵硬手术治疗 10 年随访的临床结果:病例系列。
Int J Surg. 2022 Mar;99:106590. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106590. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
9
The post-traumatic stiff elbow: A review.创伤后肘关节僵硬:综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 19;19:125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
10
Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: From Ultrasound Scanning to Treatment.肘部尺神经病变:从超声扫描到治疗
Front Neurol. 2021 May 14;12:661441. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.661441. eCollection 2021.