Lapp John M, Stukel Thérèse A, Chung Hannah, Lee Samantha, Lunsky Yona, Bell Chaim M, Cheung Angela M, Detsky Allan S, Goulding Susie, Herridge Margaret, Ahmad Aisha, Razak Fahad, Verma Amol A, Brown Hilary K, Bobos Pavlos, Quinn Kieran L
Department of Medicine, Sinai Health and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Oct 17;39:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100910. eCollection 2024 Nov.
People with disabilities are at elevated risk of adverse short-term outcomes following hospitalization for acute infectious illness. No prior studies have compared long-term healthcare use among this high-risk population. We compared the healthcare use of adults with disabilities in the one year following hospitalization for COVID-19 vs. sepsis vs. influenza.
We performed a population-based cohort study using linked clinical and health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada of all adults with pre-existing disability (physical, sensory, or intellectual) hospitalized for COVID-19 (n = 22,551, median age 69 [IQR 57-79], 47.9% female) or sepsis (n = 100,669, median age 77 [IQR 66-85], 54.8% female) between January 25, 2020, and February 28, 2022, and for influenza (n = 11,216, median age 78 [IQR 67-86], 54% female) or sepsis (n = 49,326, median age 72 [IQR 62-82], 45.8% female) between January 1, 2014 and March 25, 2019. The exposure was hospitalization for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 or influenza, or sepsis (not secondary to COVID-19 or influenza). Outcomes were ambulatory care visits, diagnostic testing, emergency department visits, hospitalization, palliative care visits and death within 1 year. Rates of these outcomes were compared across exposure groups using propensity-based overlap weighted Poisson and Cox proportional hazards models.
Among older adults with pre-existing disability, hospitalization for COVID-19 was associated with lower rates of ambulatory care visits (adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.90), diagnostic testing (aRR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.84-0.89), emergency department visits (aRR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), hospitalization (aRR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.71-0.77), palliative care visits (aRR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.62-0.81) and low hazards of death (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.71, 95% 0.68-0.75), compared to hospitalization for sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rates of healthcare use among those hospitalized for COVID-19 varied compared to those hospitalized for influenza or sepsis prior to the pandemic.
This study of older adults with pre-existing disabilities hospitalized for acute infectious illness found that COVID-19 was not associated with higher rates of healthcare use or mortality over the one year following hospital discharge compared to those hospitalized for sepsis. However, hospitalization for COVID-19 was associated with higher rates of ambulatory care use and mortality when compared to influenza. As COVID-19 enters an endemic phase, the associated long-term health resource use and risks in the contemporary era are reassuringly similar to sepsis and influenza, even among people with pre-existing disabilities.
This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Long-Term Care. This study also received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR GA4-177772).
残疾人士在因急性传染病住院后出现不良短期结局的风险较高。此前尚无研究比较过这一高危人群的长期医疗保健使用情况。我们比较了因新冠肺炎、败血症或流感住院的残疾成年人在出院后一年内的医疗保健使用情况。
我们利用加拿大安大略省的临床和卫生管理数据库进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了所有患有残疾(身体、感官或智力残疾)的成年人,这些人在2020年1月25日至2022年2月28日期间因新冠肺炎(n = 22,551,中位年龄69岁[四分位间距57 - 79岁],女性占47.9%)或败血症(n = 100,669,中位年龄77岁[四分位间距66 - 85岁],女性占54.8%)住院,以及在2014年1月1日至2019年3月25日期间因流感(n = 11,216,中位年龄78岁[四分位间距67 - 86岁],女性占54%)或败血症(n = 49,326,中位年龄72岁[四分位间距62 - 82岁],女性占45.8%)住院。暴露因素为因实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2或流感、或败血症(非继发于新冠肺炎或流感)住院。结局指标为1年内的门诊就诊、诊断检测、急诊就诊、住院、姑息治疗就诊和死亡。使用基于倾向得分的重叠加权泊松模型和Cox比例风险模型比较各暴露组的这些结局发生率。
在患有残疾的老年人中,与在新冠肺炎大流行期间因败血症住院相比,因新冠肺炎住院与较低的门诊就诊率(调整率比(aRR)0.88,95%置信区间(CI),0.87 - 0.90)、诊断检测率(aRR 0.86,95% CI,0.84 - 0.89)、急诊就诊率(aRR 0.91,95% CI,0.84 - 0.97)、住院率(aRR 0.74,95% CI,0.71 - 0.77)、姑息治疗就诊率(aRR 0.71,95% CI,0.62 - 0.81)以及较低的死亡风险(调整风险比(aHR)0.71,95% 0.68 - 0.75)相关。与大流行前因流感或败血症住院的患者相比,因新冠肺炎住院患者的医疗保健使用率有所不同。
这项针对因急性传染病住院的患有残疾的老年人的研究发现,与因败血症住院的患者相比,新冠肺炎患者在出院后一年内的医疗保健使用率或死亡率并未更高。然而,与流感相比,因新冠肺炎住院与更高的门诊就诊率和死亡率相关。随着新冠肺炎进入流行阶段,即使在患有残疾的人群中,其在当代所带来的长期健康资源使用和风险与败血症及流感令人安心地相似。
本研究由ICES支持,ICES由安大略省卫生部和长期护理部的年度拨款资助。本研究还获得了加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR GA4 - 177772)的资助。