Zheng Zhanhang, Qin Shuhong, Li Ruilin, Wang Wenjuan, Wu Chenxingzi
Faculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Front Aging. 2024 Oct 21;5:1299964. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1299964. eCollection 2024.
In the field of audiology, numerous studies have sought to understand and improve hearing rehabilitation programs for older adults afflicted with presbycusis. Despite this, the field lacks uniform standards pertaining to the intervention methods, frequency, and duration of such programs. These discrepancies have led to varying test results and inconsistent findings across multiple studies.
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hearing rehabilitation programs in enhancing the utilization of hearing aids among older adults with presbycusis.
We conducted a comprehensive exploration of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the role of hearing rehabilitation programs for patients with age-related hearing loss. The search period spanned from the inception of each database to September 12, 2024. Outcomes were synthesized using RevMan 5.4 software.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 598 patients (290 in the intervention group and 308 in the control group). It was observed that hearing rehabilitation programs significantly diminished self-perceived hearing impairment [MD = -5.80, 95% CI = (-8.16, -3.44), < 0.00001] and negative emotional states [MD = -1.66, 95% CI = (-3.02, -0.29), = 0.02], while enhancing hearing aid utilization [MD = 0.22, 95% CI = (0.08, 0.36), = 0.002]. Nonetheless, these programs did not significantly augment patients' satisfaction with their hearing aids [MD = 0.09, 95% CI = (-0.17, 0.26), = 0.66].
Hearing rehabilitation programs significantly improve hearing aid outcomes, reduce self-perceived hearing impairment, and alleviate negative emotional states in patients. However, the current body of evidence is insufficient to conclusively indicate that these programs enhance patient satisfaction with daily hearing aid usage.
在听力学领域,众多研究致力于理解和改进针对患有老年性聋的老年人的听力康复项目。尽管如此,该领域在这类项目的干预方法、频率和持续时间方面缺乏统一标准。这些差异导致多项研究的测试结果各异且结论不一致。
这项荟萃分析旨在评估听力康复项目在提高老年性聋老年人助听器使用方面的疗效。
我们全面检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,以确定评估听力康复项目对年龄相关性听力损失患者作用的随机对照试验。检索期从每个数据库创建至2024年9月12日。使用RevMan 5.4软件综合分析结果。
八项研究符合纳入标准,涉及598名患者(干预组290名,对照组308名)。结果发现,听力康复项目显著降低了自我感知的听力障碍[MD = -5.80,95%CI = (-8.16, -3.44),P < 0.00001]和负面情绪状态[MD = -1.66,95%CI = (-3.02, -0.29),P = 0.02],同时提高了助听器的使用[MD = 0.22,95%CI = (0.08, 0.36),P = 0.002]。然而,这些项目并未显著提高患者对助听器的满意度[MD = 0.09,95%CI = (-0.17, 0.26),P = 0.66]。
听力康复项目显著改善了助听器使用效果,降低了患者自我感知的听力障碍,并减轻了负面情绪状态。然而,目前的证据不足以确凿表明这些项目能提高患者对日常助听器使用的满意度。