Suppr超能文献

评估分数、自我效能感与临床实践的系统调查:它们之间有关联吗?

A Systematic Investigation of Assessment Scores, Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Practice: Are They Related?

作者信息

Lucero Katie Stringer, Moore Donald E

机构信息

Medscape Education, Medscape, LLC, Newark, NJ, USA.

School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J CME. 2024 Oct 30;13(1):2420373. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2420373. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

A considerable amount of continuing professional development (CPD) for health professionals is online and voluntary. There is evidence that some CPD activities impact clinical practice outcomes from self-reported and objective, administrative data. Some studies have shown that there is a potential mediating effect of knowledge/competency and/or self-efficacy between participation in CPD activities and the outcomes of that participation, specifically clinical practice. However, because clinical practice in those studies has been self-report, little is known about how this relationship impacts real world clinical practice. The purpose of the current study is to examine the relationship between knowledge/competency, self-efficacy, and real-world clinical practice so that we can begin to understand whether our focus on knowledge/competency and self-efficacy to change real-world clinical practice is empirically supported. We employed secondary data analysis from pre-participation questionnaire and medical and pharmacy claims data originally collected in three evaluations of online CPD interventions to examine if the relationship between knowledge/competency and self-efficacy contributed to physicians' real-world clinical practice. Results show an association between knowledge/competency scores and ratings of self-efficacy and suggest unique contributions of knowledge/competency and self-efficacy to clinical practice. Study results support the value of knowledge/competency scores and self-efficacy ratings as predictors of clinical practice. The effect size was larger for self-efficacy suggesting it may be a more practical indicator of clinical practice for CPD evaluators because its process of question development is simpler than the process for knowledge and case-based decision-making questions. However, it is important to conduct thorough need assessments which may include knowledge/competency assessments to identify topics to cover in CPD activities that are more likely to increase self-efficacy and ultimately, clinical practice.

摘要

卫生专业人员的大量持续专业发展(CPD)是在线且自愿的。有证据表明,一些CPD活动会通过自我报告以及客观的行政数据影响临床实践结果。一些研究表明,在参与CPD活动与该参与的结果(特别是临床实践)之间,知识/能力和/或自我效能可能起到中介作用。然而,由于那些研究中的临床实践是自我报告的,所以对于这种关系如何影响现实世界中的临床实践知之甚少。本研究的目的是检验知识/能力、自我效能与现实世界临床实践之间的关系,以便我们能够开始了解我们对知识/能力和自我效能以改变现实世界临床实践的关注是否得到实证支持。我们对参与前问卷以及最初在三项在线CPD干预评估中收集的医疗和药房理赔数据进行了二次数据分析,以检验知识/能力与自我效能之间的关系是否有助于医生的现实世界临床实践。结果显示知识/能力得分与自我效能评级之间存在关联,并表明知识/能力和自我效能对临床实践有独特贡献。研究结果支持将知识/能力得分和自我效能评级作为临床实践预测指标的价值。自我效能的效应量更大,这表明它可能是CPD评估者评估临床实践的更实用指标,因为其问题开发过程比知识和基于案例的决策问题的过程更简单。然而,进行全面的需求评估很重要,这可能包括知识/能力评估,以确定CPD活动中更有可能提高自我效能并最终改善临床实践的主题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6451/11533230/93d79dbf2153/ZJEC_A_2420373_UF0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验