Meyer Allison E, Choi Seo Youn, Tugendrajch Siena, Rodriguez-Quintana Natalie, Smith Shawna N, Koschmann Elizabeth, Abelson James L, Bilek Emily L
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2024;9(3):411-428. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2024.2324770. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Schools are a promising access point for youth with mental health concerns, but school-based mental health professionals (SPs) often need ongoing support to provide high-fidelity cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Adherence and competence, two critical elements of fidelity, were examined in a cluster-randomized implementation trial. We evaluated CBT adherence and then triangulated CBT adherence with end-of-study competence. We then evaluated the effects of two implementation supports, Coaching and (for slower-responding schools) Facilitation, on adherence and competence. By the end of the 43-week study period, 27.8% of SPs met adherence criteria. Adherent SPs scored higher on the competence measure, the CBT Competence Scale ( (116.2) = 3.71, < .001). No significant difference in adherence was found among SPs at schools assigned to Coaching vs. not (Δ = 6.0%, = .385), however SPs at schools randomized to Coaching scored significantly higher on two of the four competence subscales (Non-Behavioral and Behavioral skills). Among slower-responder schools, SPs at schools assigned to Facilitation were more likely to demonstrate adherence (Δ = 16.3%, = .022), but there was no effect of Facilitation on competence. Approximately one quarter of SPs met adherence criteria in the trial; adequate delivery of exposure was a primary obstacle to reaching adherence. Facilitation may be especially suited to help SPs overcome barriers to delivery, whereas Coaching may be especially suited to help SPs improve CBT competence. Both are likely needed to build a mental health work force with the competence and ability to deliver EBPs in schools.
学校是接触有心理健康问题青少年的一个有前景的切入点,但学校心理健康专业人员(SPs)通常需要持续的支持来提供高保真认知行为疗法(CBT)。在一项整群随机实施试验中,对保真度的两个关键要素——依从性和能力进行了研究。我们评估了CBT依从性,然后将CBT依从性与研究结束时的能力进行三角测量。然后,我们评估了两种实施支持措施——辅导以及(针对反应较慢的学校)促进措施对依从性和能力的影响。在为期43周的研究期结束时,27.8%的SPs达到了依从性标准。达到依从性标准的SPs在能力测量指标CBT能力量表上得分更高((116.2)=3.71,<.001)。在分配接受辅导与未接受辅导的学校中,SPs的依从性没有显著差异(Δ=6.0%,=.385),然而,随机分配到辅导组的学校中的SPs在四个能力子量表中的两个(非行为技能和行为技能)上得分显著更高。在反应较慢的学校中,分配接受促进措施的学校中的SPs更有可能表现出依从性(Δ=16.3%,=.022),但促进措施对能力没有影响。在该试验中,约四分之一的SPs达到了依从性标准;充分实施暴露疗法是达到依从性的主要障碍。促进措施可能特别适合帮助SPs克服实施障碍,而辅导可能特别适合帮助SPs提高CBT能力。要打造一支有能力在学校提供循证实践的心理健康工作队伍,可能两者都需要。