• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HTA 方法创新路线图(IHTAM):来自三种定量方法案例研究的见解。

Roadmap to Innovation of HTA Methods (IHTAM): insights from three case studies of quantitative methods.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e49. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000564.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000564
PMID:39498479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11563180/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A conceptual framework, called Innovation of Health Technology Assessment Methods (IHTAM), has been developed to facilitate the understanding of how to innovate methods of health technology assessment (HTA). However, the framework applicability has not been evaluated in practice. Hence, we aimed to explore framework applicability in three cases of method innovation that are part of the HTx project and to develop a roadmap to improve framework applicability.

METHODS

The IHTAM framework was applied to three cases of innovating HTA methods. We collected feedback from case study leaders and consortium members after a training session, an approximately 1-year follow-up of periodic case study meetings, and a general assembly meeting where innovation progresses of the three cases were reported through surveys and interviews. Feedback was then summarized using an open-coding technique.

RESULTS

According to feedback, the framework provided a structured way of deliberation and helped to improve collaboration among HTA stakeholders. However, framework applicability could be improved if it was complemented by a roadmap with a loop structure to provide tailored guidance for different cases, and with items to elaborate actions to be taken by stakeholders. Accordingly, a 48-item roadmap was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The IHTAM framework was generally applicable to the three case studies. A roadmap, with loop structure and actionable items, could complement the framework, and may provide HTA stakeholders with tailored guidance on developing new methods. To further examine the framework applicability, we recommend stakeholders to apply the IHTAM framework and its roadmap in future practice.

摘要

目的

开发了一个名为“卫生技术评估方法创新框架(IHTAM)”的概念框架,以帮助理解如何创新卫生技术评估(HTA)方法。然而,该框架在实践中的适用性尚未得到评估。因此,我们旨在通过探索 HTx 项目中方法创新的三个案例来研究框架的适用性,并制定改善框架适用性的路线图。

方法

将 IHTAM 框架应用于三种创新 HTA 方法的案例中。在培训会议之后、大约为期一年的定期案例会议随访期间以及通过调查和访谈报告三个案例的创新进展的全体会议上,我们从案例研究负责人和联盟成员那里收集了反馈意见。然后使用开放式编码技术对反馈意见进行总结。

结果

根据反馈意见,该框架提供了一种深思熟虑的结构化方法,并有助于改善 HTA 利益相关者之间的合作。但是,如果框架能够通过具有循环结构的路线图得到补充,为不同的案例提供量身定制的指导,并详细说明利益相关者应采取的行动,那么框架的适用性可以得到提高。因此,制定了一个包含 48 个项目的路线图。

结论

IHTAM 框架总体上适用于这三个案例研究。具有循环结构和可操作项目的路线图可以补充该框架,并为 HTA 利益相关者提供制定新方法的量身定制指导。为了进一步检验框架的适用性,我们建议利益相关者在未来的实践中应用 IHTAM 框架及其路线图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/11563180/14c418b1dfc5/S0266462324000564_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/11563180/14c418b1dfc5/S0266462324000564_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/11563180/14c418b1dfc5/S0266462324000564_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Roadmap to Innovation of HTA Methods (IHTAM): insights from three case studies of quantitative methods.HTA 方法创新路线图(IHTAM):来自三种定量方法案例研究的见解。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e49. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000564.
2
Understanding innovation of health technology assessment methods: the IHTAM framework.理解卫生技术评估方法的创新:IHTAM 框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 31;38(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000010.
3
The development of a roadmap for Health Technology Assessment implementation in Moldova.制定摩尔多瓦卫生技术评估实施路线图。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 21;13:518. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146025.2. eCollection 2024.
4
INTEGRATE-HTA: THE PERSPECTIVE OF EUnetHTA.整合-HTA:EUnetHTA 的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(5):605-608. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000691. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
6
The HTA Core Model-10 Years of Developing an International Framework to Share Multidimensional Value Assessment.卫生技术评估核心模型——构建用于分享多维价值评估的国际框架的十年历程
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.010.
7
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT THROUGHOUT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: AN EXAMPLE FROM PALLIATIVE CARE.利益相关者全程参与卫生技术评估:姑息治疗实例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(5):552-561. doi: 10.1017/S026646231700068X. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment: the Queensland Health experience.用于卫生技术评估的多标准决策分析(MCDA):昆士兰卫生部门的经验
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Oct;43(5):591-599. doi: 10.1071/AH18042.
9
Testing a new taxonomic model for the assessment of medical devices: Is it plausible and applicable? Insights from HTA reports and interviews with HTA institutions in Europe.测试一种新的医疗器械评估分类模型:是否合理且适用?来自欧洲 HTA 报告和 HTA 机构访谈的观点。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
TOWARD A CONTINGENCY MODEL FOR HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: EVIDENCE FROM ADHOPHTA PROJECT.迈向基于医院的卫生技术评估的权变模型:来自 ADHOPHTA 项目的证据。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):205-211. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000119. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A literature review of quality assessment and applicability to HTA of risk prediction models of coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者冠心病风险预测模型的质量评估和适用性的文献综述用于 HTA。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;209:111574. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111574. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
2
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.健康决策中的因果证据:因果推断方法和健康决策科学。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Dec 21;20:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/000314. eCollection 2022.
3
Target trial emulation: applying principles of randomised trials to observational studies.
目标试验模拟:将随机试验原则应用于观察性研究。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 30;378:e071108. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071108.
4
Causal machine learning for healthcare and precision medicine.用于医疗保健和精准医学的因果机器学习。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 3;9(8):220638. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220638. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Reported Challenges in Health Technology Assessment of Complex Health Technologies.复杂医疗技术的卫生技术评估报告中的挑战
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1356. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Target Trial Emulation for Transparent and Robust Estimation of Treatment Effects for Health Technology Assessment Using Real-World Data: Opportunities and Challenges.利用真实世界数据进行透明、稳健的卫生技术评估治疗效果的目标试验模拟:机遇与挑战。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jun;40(6):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01141-x. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
Understanding innovation of health technology assessment methods: the IHTAM framework.理解卫生技术评估方法的创新:IHTAM 框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 31;38(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000010.
8
Large-scale validation of the prediction model risk of bias assessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination.使用简化形式对预测模型偏倚评估工具(PROBAST)进行大规模验证:高偏倚风险模型显示出较差的区分度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Real-world data for health technology assessment for reimbursement decisions in Asia: current landscape and a way forward.亚洲用于报销决策的卫生技术评估的真实世界数据:现状与未来方向。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Oct;36(5):474-480. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000628. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Key challenges in normal tissue complication probability model development and validation: towards a comprehensive strategy.正常组织并发症概率模型建立和验证的关键挑战:走向全面策略。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 23.