From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (M.H., D.A., S.T., F.H.M., A.A.B.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.D.S.).
Radiology. 2024 Nov;313(2):e241171. doi: 10.1148/radiol.241171.
Background CT plays an important role in the opportunistic identification of hepatic steatosis. CT performance for steatosis detection has been inconsistent across various studies, and no clear guidelines on optimum thresholds have been established. Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess CT diagnostic accuracy in hepatic steatosis detection and to determine reliable cutoffs for the commonly mentioned measures in the literature. Materials and Methods A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases (English-language studies published from September 1977 to January 2024) was performed. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT (NCCT), contrast-enhanced (CECT), and dual-energy CT (DECT) for hepatic steatosis detection were included. Reference standards included biopsy, MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), or NCCT. In several CECT and DECT studies, NCCT was used as the reference standard, necessitating subgroup analysis. Statistical analysis included a random-effects meta-analysis, assessment of heterogeneity with use of the statistic, and meta-regression to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. When available, mean liver attenuation, liver-spleen attenuation difference, liver to spleen attenuation ratio, and the DECT-derived fat fraction for hepatic steatosis diagnosis were assessed. Results Forty-two studies (14 186 participants) were included. NCCT had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 88%, respectively, for steatosis (>5% fat at biopsy) detection and 82% and 94% for at least moderate steatosis (over 20%-33% fat at biopsy) detection. CECT had a sensitivity and specificity of 66% and 90% for steatosis detection and 68% and 93% for at least moderate steatosis detection. DECT had a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 88% for steatosis detection. In the subgroup analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting steatosis were 80% and 99% for CECT and 84% and 93% for DECT. There was heterogeneity among studies focusing on CECT and DECT. Liver attenuation less than 40-45 HU, liver-spleen attenuation difference less than -5 to 0 HU, and liver to spleen attenuation ratio less than 0.9-1 achieved high specificity for detection of at least moderate steatosis. Conclusion NCCT showed high performance for detection of at least moderate steatosis. © RSNA, 2024
背景 CT 在机会性识别肝脂肪变性方面发挥着重要作用。CT 对脂肪变性检测的性能在不同研究中并不一致,也没有确立关于最佳阈值的明确指南。目的 进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估 CT 在肝脂肪变性检测中的诊断准确性,并确定文献中常用测量指标的可靠截止值。材料与方法 对 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库(1977 年 9 月至 2024 年 1 月发表的英文研究)进行了系统检索。纳入评估非对比 CT(NCCT)、对比增强(CECT)和双能 CT(DECT)检测肝脂肪变性的诊断准确性的研究。参考标准包括活检、磁共振质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)或 NCCT。在一些 CECT 和 DECT 研究中,NCCT 被用作参考标准,因此需要进行亚组分析。统计分析包括随机效应荟萃分析,使用 Q 统计量评估异质性,以及元回归探索潜在的异质性来源。当可用时,评估用于诊断肝脂肪变性的平均肝脏衰减值、肝脾衰减差值、肝脾衰减比和 DECT 衍生的脂肪分数。结果 纳入 42 项研究(14186 名参与者)。NCCT 检测脂肪变性(活检中脂肪>5%)的敏感度和特异度分别为 72%和 88%,检测至少中度脂肪变性(活检中脂肪>20%-33%)的敏感度和特异度分别为 82%和 94%。CECT 检测脂肪变性的敏感度和特异度分别为 66%和 90%,检测至少中度脂肪变性的敏感度和特异度分别为 68%和 93%。DECT 检测脂肪变性的敏感度和特异度分别为 85%和 88%。在亚组分析中,CECT 和 DECT 检测脂肪变性的敏感度和特异度分别为 80%和 99%和 84%和 93%。针对 CECT 和 DECT 的研究存在异质性。肝脏衰减值<40-45 HU、肝脾衰减差值< -5 至 0 HU 和肝脾衰减比<0.9-1 时,检测至少中度脂肪变性的特异性较高。结论 NCCT 对检测至少中度脂肪变性具有较高的性能。©RSNA,2024