• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院治疗后应对困难:出院后应对困难量表德语版的效度和信度。

Coping difficulties after inpatient hospital treatment: validity and reliability of the German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale.

机构信息

Institute for Patient Safety (IfPS), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Medical Management Division, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 5;8(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00806-9.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00806-9
PMID:39499458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11538096/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients transitioning between different care contexts are at increased risk of experiencing adverse events. In particular, being discharged to home after inpatient treatment involves significant risks. However, there is a lack of valid and internationally comparable assessment tools on patients' experiences of difficulties following hospital discharge. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS-G).

METHODS

Patients were recruited at a German university hospital. 815 adult patients participated in a self-report survey following an inpatient stay of at least three days. Factorial validity of the PDCDS-G was evaluated via factor analyses. Further, examination of measurement invariance was performed. To establish criterion validity, associations with patients' self-reported health status and occurrence of patient safety were determined. Further, group differences regarding patient characteristics, hospitalization factors, and survey-related variables were examined.

RESULTS

Factorial validity of the PDCDS-G was confirmed by a two-factorial model with good model fit. Both factors showed good to excellent reliability. The two-factor model achieved measurement invariance across all patient characteristics, hospitalization factors, and survey-related variables. Significant relationships with patients' health status and the occurrence of patient safety incidents corroborate criterion validity of the PDCDS-G. Differential associations of the two PDCDS-G factors regarding patient characteristics, hospitalization, and survey-related variables were found.

DISCUSSION

Construct and criterion validity, as well as the reliability of the PDCDS-G, were verified. Further, instrument's measurement invariance was confirmed allowing use of the scale for the interpretation of group differences and comparisons between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The PDCDS-G provides a validated and comparable patient-reported outcomes measure for patient experiences after hospital discharge to home. The PDCDS-G can be used for patient surveys in quality or patient safety improvement in care transition processes.

摘要

背景

在不同的医疗环境之间转换的患者面临更高的不良事件风险。特别是,从住院治疗出院回家会带来很大的风险。然而,目前缺乏针对患者出院后困难经历的有效且具有国际可比性的评估工具。因此,本研究旨在改编并验证德国版出院后应对困难量表(PDCDS-G)。

方法

在一家德国大学医院招募患者。815 名成年患者在住院至少三天后参加了一项自我报告调查。通过因子分析评估 PDCDS-G 的因子有效性。此外,还进行了测量不变性的检验。为了建立效标效度,确定了患者自我报告的健康状况和患者安全事件发生与 PDCDS-G 的关联。进一步,还检查了患者特征、住院因素和调查相关变量的组间差异。

结果

PDCDS-G 的因子有效性通过具有良好模型拟合度的双因子模型得到证实。两个因子的可靠性均较好。双因子模型在所有患者特征、住院因素和调查相关变量上都实现了测量不变性。与患者健康状况和患者安全事件发生的显著关系证实了 PDCDS-G 的效标效度。在患者特征、住院和调查相关变量方面,PDCDS-G 的两个因子存在不同的关联。

讨论

验证了 PDCDS-G 的构建和效标效度以及可靠性。此外,还证实了该工具的测量不变性,从而允许使用该量表来解释组间差异和比较研究。

结论

PDCDS-G 为患者出院后回家的体验提供了一种经过验证且可比较的患者报告结局测量工具。PDCDS-G 可用于患者调查,以改善医疗过渡过程中的质量或患者安全。

相似文献

1
Coping difficulties after inpatient hospital treatment: validity and reliability of the German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale.住院治疗后应对困难:出院后应对困难量表德语版的效度和信度。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 5;8(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00806-9.
2
Measuring transitional patient safety: Adaptation and validation of the German version of the Care Transitions Measure.测量过渡期患者安全:德国版护理转衔度量表的调适与验证。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Dec;182-183:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
Reliability and validity of the Chinese post-discharge coping difficulty scale-parent form in parents of premature infants: a multicenter cross-sectional study.中文版早产儿出院后父母应对困难量表家长版在早产儿父母中的信效度:一项多中心横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 6;14:1095485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095485. eCollection 2023.
4
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
5
Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale for the Mental Health Surveillance (MHS) of German adults.验证 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(WMBS)在德国成年人心理健康监测(MHS)中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Oct 26;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02304-4.
6
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form.土耳其语版准备出院量表/简表的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Apr;26(3):295-301. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12547. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
German Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS): psychometric properties from a representative population survey.德国自杀意念贝克量表(BSS):来自代表性人群调查的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 4;17(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1559-9.
9
Translation and psychometric evaluation of a French version of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale.《出院准备度量表》法语版的翻译及心理测量学评估
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2983-92. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12937. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the German Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and its potential for cross-cultural comparisons: a cross-sectional study.评估德国医院患者安全文化调查的心理测量特性及其进行跨文化比较的潜力:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 9;7(11):e018366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018366.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Quality of Discharge Teaching and Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty in Postoperative Lung Cancer Patients: A Chain Mediation Model.肺癌术后患者出院指导质量与出院后应对困难的关联:链式中介模型
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 18;32(8):468. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080468.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring transitional patient safety: Adaptation and validation of the German version of the Care Transitions Measure.测量过渡期患者安全:德国版护理转衔度量表的调适与验证。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Dec;182-183:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Reliability and validity of the Chinese post-discharge coping difficulty scale-parent form in parents of premature infants: a multicenter cross-sectional study.中文版早产儿出院后父母应对困难量表家长版在早产儿父母中的信效度:一项多中心横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 6;14:1095485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095485. eCollection 2023.
3
Psychometric properties of the German revised version of the eHealth literacy scale in individuals with cardiac diseases: Validation and test of measurement invariance.心脏病患者中eHealth素养量表德文修订版的心理测量特性:测量不变性的验证与测试
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 14;9:20552076231194915. doi: 10.1177/20552076231194915. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate.唇腭裂婴儿出生后,由专科腭裂护士对其父母进行早期随访。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Aug;61(8):1369-1382. doi: 10.1177/10556656231171750. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
The post-discharge coping difficulty of puerperal women in a middle and low-income tourist city during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间,中低收入旅游城市产妇产后出院后的应对困难
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05554-0.
6
Quality of Care Transition During Hospital Discharge, Patient Safety, and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: a Cross-Sectional Study.出院期间的医疗照护交接质量、患者安全与减重手术后体重反弹:一项横断面研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Apr;33(4):1143-1153. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06486-6. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
7
Meeting the Needs of ICU Survivors: A Gap Requiring Systems Thinking and Shared Vision.满足重症监护病房幸存者的需求:一个需要系统思维和共同愿景的差距。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Feb 1;51(2):319-335. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005754. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
8
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
9
Development of the Presbyopia Impact and Coping Questionnaire.老花眼影响与应对问卷的编制
Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):1057-1075. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00391-w. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
10
Interventions to Improve Communication at Hospital Discharge and Rates of Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施以改善出院时的沟通和再入院率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119346. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19346.