• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单和复杂跨度中的邻频效应:高频邻居是有帮助还是有伤害?

Neighborhood frequency effects in simple and complex span: Do high-frequency neighbors help or hurt?

机构信息

Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, 390 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1871-1881. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01658-w. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01658-w
PMID:39499459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588882/
Abstract

A word's orthographic neighborhood is the set of words that differ from the target word by one letter. Both Roodenrys (2009) and Robert et al. (Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 119-125, 2015) posit that orthographic neighbors are activated when the target word is encountered in tasks such as simple and complex span. The two accounts differ in that the former predicts a beneficial effect of this activation, because it produces feedback activation that helps redintegrate the target word, whereas the latter predicts a detrimental effect, because the need to overcome the greater interference from the larger number of higher-frequency items reduces the processing resources available. Four experiments assess the predictions of these two accounts. Experiments 1 and 2 found a beneficial effect of having a higher- compared with a lower-frequency neighborhood in both a simple and a complex span task. Experiments 3 and 4 found no detrimental effect of having one or more neighbors with higher frequency than the target in both a simple and complex span task. Implications for the two theories are discussed.

摘要

一个单词的正字法邻域是指与目标单词仅相差一个字母的单词集合。Roodenrys(2009)和 Robert 等人(《心理语言学研究杂志》,44,119-125,2015)都假设在简单和复杂跨度等任务中遇到目标单词时会激活正字法邻域。这两个解释存在差异,前者预测这种激活会产生有益的影响,因为它会产生反馈激活,有助于重新整合目标单词,而后者则预测会产生不利的影响,因为需要克服更大数量的更高频率项目带来的更大干扰,会减少可用的处理资源。四项实验评估了这两个解释的预测。实验 1 和 2 发现,在简单和复杂跨度任务中,与低频邻域相比,具有更高频率邻域的单词会产生有益的影响。实验 3 和 4 发现,在简单和复杂跨度任务中,一个或多个邻域的频率高于目标时,不会产生不利影响。对这两个理论的影响进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f68/11588882/8d34faaf823b/13421_2024_1658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f68/11588882/eb72303ee241/13421_2024_1658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f68/11588882/8d34faaf823b/13421_2024_1658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f68/11588882/eb72303ee241/13421_2024_1658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f68/11588882/8d34faaf823b/13421_2024_1658_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neighborhood frequency effects in simple and complex span: Do high-frequency neighbors help or hurt?简单和复杂跨度中的邻频效应:高频邻居是有帮助还是有伤害?
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1871-1881. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01658-w. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
The effect of orthographic neighborhood in the reading span task.正字法邻域在阅读广度任务中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Apr;44(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9287-5.
3
Does neighborhood size really cause the word length effect?邻里规模真的会导致词长效应吗?
Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):244-260. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0761-9.
4
WordPars: A tool for orthographic and phonological neighborhood and other psycholinguistic statistics in Persian.WordPars:一个用于波斯语正字法和音韵近邻以及其他心理语言学统计的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1902-1911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01712-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.词频和语音邻域对言语短期记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1019.
6
Exploring the necessary conditions for phonological interference in serial recall.探究序列回忆中语音干扰的必要条件。
Memory. 2023 Aug;31(7):891-904. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2200587. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Neighborhood Frequency Effect in Chinese Word Recognition: Evidence from Naming and Lexical Decision.中文词汇识别中的邻域频率效应:来自命名和词汇判断任务的证据
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):227-245. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9431-5.
8
Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect?长度或邻域大小会导致词长效应吗?
Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1198-210. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0094-z.
9
Orthographic neighborhood effects in recognition and recall tasks in a transparent orthography.透明正字法中识别和回忆任务的正字法邻域效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):565-578. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000327. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Orthographic and phonological neighborhood effects in handwritten word perception.手写单词感知中的正字法和语音邻域效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1739-45. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0846-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Set size and the orthographic/phonological neighbourhood size effect in serial recognition: The importance of randomization.项目大小和正字法/语音邻域大小效应对序列识别的影响:随机化的重要性。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2024 Mar;78(1):9-16. doi: 10.1037/cep0000320. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
2
The orthographic/phonological neighbourhood size effect and set size.正字法/语音近邻大小效应与集大小。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Feb;77(2):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17470218231165863. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Semantic Relatedness Effects in Serial Recall But Not in Serial Reconstruction of Order.
语义相关性在系列回忆中起作用,但在系列顺序重构中不起作用。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):196-209. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000557. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence.贝叶斯因子设计分析:为有力证据进行规划。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y.
5
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests.实验心理学中的统计证据:使用 855 个 t 检验的实证比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923.
6
The effect of orthographic neighborhood in the reading span task.正字法邻域在阅读广度任务中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Apr;44(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9287-5.
7
Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect?长度或邻域大小会导致词长效应吗?
Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1198-210. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0094-z.
8
When does length cause the word length effect?长度何时导致单词长度效应?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):338-53. doi: 10.1037/a0021804.
9
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.超越库切拉和弗朗西斯:当前词频规范的批判性评估,以及美国英语新的、经过改进的词频衡量标准的引入。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.
10
Moving beyond Coltheart's N: a new measure of orthographic similarity.超越科尔特哈特的N:一种新的正字法相似性度量方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):971-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971.