Suppr超能文献

哮喘与2019冠状病毒病:基于不同内型揭示结局差异及治疗影响

Asthma and COVID-19: Unveiling Outcome Disparities and Treatment Impact Based on Distinct Endotypes.

作者信息

Sines Benjamin, Morrison Cameron B, Donaldson Jenna M, Ahmad Asiyah, Krishnamurthy Ashok, Peden David B, Ehre Camille

机构信息

Department of Medicine.

Marsico Lung Institute.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Mar;22(3):339-349. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202405-507OC.

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies on patients with asthma and data suggest a protective role of type 2 (T2) inflammation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Using a large, multisite cohort, we studied clinical outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple asthma endotypes and examined the effects of T2-directed biologics in infected patients with asthma. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative Data Enclave was used to identify and stratify patients with asthma by endotype to include those with non-T2 and T2 asthma, as well as exposure to T2-directed biologic therapy. We evaluated the risk of hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation, and 90-day mortality by endotype and exposure to biologics. For this study, 402,376 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 138,142 (34%) were characterized as having non-T2 asthma and 264,234 (66%) as having T2 asthma, a group further divided into 104,823 (26%) atopic, 84,440 (21%) eosinophilic, and 74,971 (19%) T2-high asthmatic endotypes. Compared with patients with non-T2 asthma, those with atopic and T2-high asthma experienced decreased odds of hospitalization and 90-day mortality. Conversely, patients with eosinophilic asthma experienced higher odds of hospitalization, intubation, and 90-day mortality. Exposure to T2-directed biologic therapies did not alter outcomes after propensity score matching. In contrast, maximum eosinophil count and recent systemic corticosteroid use were directly correlated with increased odds of all outcomes. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outcomes differ depending on asthma endotype, with patients with atopic asthma experiencing lower odds and those with eosinophilic asthma experiencing higher odds of deleterious outcomes. T2-directed biologic treatment did not alter these outcomes, but recent systemic corticosteroid use predisposes all patients with asthma to adverse outcomes.

摘要

关于哮喘患者的流行病学研究及数据表明,2型(T2)炎症在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染中具有保护作用。我们利用一个大型多中心队列,研究了多种哮喘内型在SARS-CoV-2感染后的临床结局,并考察了T2靶向生物制剂对感染的哮喘患者的影响。利用国家新冠队列协作数据平台,根据内型对哮喘患者进行识别和分层,纳入非T2哮喘和T2哮喘患者,以及接受T2靶向生物治疗的患者。我们按内型和生物制剂暴露情况评估了住院、有创机械通气及90天死亡率的风险。本研究中,402376例患者符合纳入标准,其中138142例(34%)为非T2哮喘,264234例(66%)为T2哮喘,T2哮喘组进一步分为104823例(26%)特应性、84440例(21%)嗜酸性粒细胞性和74971例(19%)T2高哮喘内型。与非T2哮喘患者相比,特应性和T2高哮喘患者的住院及90天死亡几率降低。相反,嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的住院、插管及90天死亡几率更高。倾向评分匹配后,T2靶向生物治疗的暴露情况并未改变结局。相比之下,最高嗜酸性粒细胞计数和近期全身使用皮质类固醇与所有结局几率增加直接相关。冠状病毒病(COVID-19)结局因哮喘内型而异,特应性哮喘患者不良结局几率较低,嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者不良结局几率较高。T2靶向生物治疗并未改变这些结局,但近期全身使用皮质类固醇使所有哮喘患者更易出现不良结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dead/11892659/7862be0a1a01/AnnalsATS.202405-507OCf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验