Suppr超能文献

多感官干预对降低早产儿疼痛的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。

Comparative effectiveness of multi-sensory interventions for reducing pain among premature infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shen Mei-di, Ding Xiang-Dong, Fu Li, He Hong-Xiao, Chen Si-Bing, Hu Yin-Chu, Wang Chong-Kun, Ren Li-Hua

机构信息

School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jan;161:104947. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104947. Epub 2024 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A series of multi-sensory interventions are proved to be effective in reducing pain among premature infants. Nevertheless, there lacks a comparison of these interventions to find the most suitable and optimal one for clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of various multi-sensory interventions, and to identify the optimal intervention for alleviating pain in premature infants.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on August 19, 2024 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (version 2) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of each included study. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions and to identify the optimal ones.

RESULTS

A total of 18 clinical trials involving 1408 premature infants were included. Three multi-sensory interventions were shown to be superior to routine practice in reducing pain among premature infants, including tactile-kinesthetic intervention, tactile-auditory intervention and tactile-visual-gustatory-olfactory intervention (all, P < 0.05). Among these interventions, tactile-kinesthetic intervention ranks the best for its effectiveness in alleviating procedural pain among premature infants. Subgroup network meta-analysis demonstrated that the tactile-visual-gustatory-auditory-olfactory intervention ranked the best for its effectiveness in reducing pain from invasive procedures, with the tactile-auditory intervention best for non-invasive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that cautious assessment and identification should be prioritized to select appropriate multi-sensory interventions based on pain procedures, thus to effectively reduce pain in premature infants. Subsequent studies are needed to refine and optimize these strategies for broader application.

PROSPERO REGISTRY

CRD42024510352.

摘要

背景

一系列多感官干预措施已被证明可有效减轻早产儿的疼痛。然而,缺乏对这些干预措施的比较,以找到最适合且最佳的措施用于临床决策。

目的

本系统评价和网状Meta分析旨在比较各种多感官干预措施的有效性,并确定缓解早产儿疼痛的最佳干预措施。

方法

于2024年8月19日进行全面的文献检索,以识别相关的临床试验。采用Cochrane偏倚风险(第2版)评估每项纳入研究的质量和潜在偏倚。使用网状Meta分析评估各种干预措施的有效性并确定最佳措施。

结果

共纳入18项涉及1408例早产儿的临床试验。三项多感官干预措施在减轻早产儿疼痛方面优于常规做法,包括触觉 - 动觉干预、触觉 - 听觉干预和触觉 - 视觉 - 味觉 - 嗅觉干预(均P < 0.05)。在这些干预措施中,触觉 - 动觉干预在减轻早产儿程序性疼痛方面效果最佳,排名第一。亚组网状Meta分析表明,触觉 - 视觉 - 味觉 - 听觉 - 嗅觉干预在减轻侵入性操作疼痛方面效果最佳,触觉 - 听觉干预在非侵入性操作方面效果最佳。

结论

我们的研究表明,应优先进行谨慎评估和识别,以根据疼痛操作选择合适的多感官干预措施,从而有效减轻早产儿的疼痛。后续需要开展研究来完善和优化这些策略,以实现更广泛的应用。

PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42024510352。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验