• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科实施青少年预防性健康干预措施的促进因素:一项多中心定性分析。

Facilitators to implementing preventive health interventions for adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Rutland Emily, Bugaighis Mona, Cruz Andrea T, Goyal Monika K, Mistry Rakesh D, Reed Jennifer L, Santelli John S, Dayan Peter S, Chernick Lauren S

机构信息

Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;32(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/acem.15043. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1111/acem.15043
PMID:39500557
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Adolescents frequently use the emergency department (ED) to meet their health care needs, and many use the ED as their primary source of care. The ED is therefore well situated to provide preventive health care to large numbers of adolescents. The objective of this multicenter qualitative analysis was to identify factors that influence the implementation of preventive health care interventions for adolescent patients in the ED.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with ED health care providers (HCPs) from five academic pediatric EDs in distinct geographic regions. We developed an interview guide to explore HCP attitudes and beliefs related to implementing preventive health interventions in the ED. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three investigators. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a guide to code and analyze interview data. We collaboratively generated themes that represent factors that are perceived to facilitate the implementation of preventive health interventions for adolescent patients in the ED setting.

RESULTS

We conducted 38 interviews (18 pediatric emergency medicine attendings/fellows, 11 registered nurses, five nurse practitioners, or and four physician assistants). We generated 10 themes across the five CFIR domains: innovation characteristics (designing interventions to promote adolescent engagement), inner setting (integrating interventions into ED workflow and scope, minimizing provider burden), outer setting (involving the community, aligning with departmental and institutional missions), individuals (identifying champions), and implementation process (involving key stakeholders early, having patience, and targeting all patients to reduce stigma).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors facilitating implementation of preventive health interventions for adolescent patients in the ED encompassed multiple CFIR domains, elucidating how the delivery of preventive health interventions for this patient population in the ED requires considering numerous factors comprehensively. These data suggest methods to enhance and facilitate implementation of preventive health interventions for adolescents in the ED.

摘要

目的

青少年经常利用急诊科(ED)来满足他们的医疗保健需求,许多人将急诊科作为其主要的医疗服务来源。因此,急诊科非常适合为大量青少年提供预防性医疗保健。这项多中心定性分析的目的是确定影响急诊科为青少年患者实施预防性医疗保健干预措施的因素。

方法

我们对来自不同地理区域的五家学术性儿科急诊科的急诊科医疗服务提供者(HCPs)进行了半结构化访谈。我们制定了一份访谈指南,以探讨HCPs对在急诊科实施预防性健康干预措施的态度和信念。访谈由三名研究人员进行记录、转录和编码。实施研究综合框架(CFIR)被用作编码和分析访谈数据的指南。我们共同生成了代表被认为有助于在急诊科环境中为青少年患者实施预防性健康干预措施的因素的主题。

结果

我们进行了38次访谈(18名儿科急诊医学主治医师/研究员、11名注册护士、5名执业护士和4名医师助理)。我们在CFIR的五个领域中生成了10个主题:创新特征(设计促进青少年参与的干预措施)、内部环境(将干预措施整合到急诊科工作流程和范围中,减轻提供者负担)、外部环境(让社区参与,与部门和机构使命保持一致)、个人(确定倡导者)以及实施过程(尽早让关键利益相关者参与,保持耐心,并针对所有患者以减少污名化)。

结论

促进急诊科为青少年患者实施预防性健康干预措施的因素涵盖了CFIR的多个领域,阐明了在急诊科为该患者群体提供预防性健康干预措施需要全面考虑众多因素。这些数据提出了加强和促进急诊科为青少年实施预防性健康干预措施的方法。

相似文献

1
Facilitators to implementing preventive health interventions for adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter qualitative analysis.急诊科实施青少年预防性健康干预措施的促进因素:一项多中心定性分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;32(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/acem.15043. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Factors influencing the conduction of confidential conversations with adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter, qualitative analysis.影响在急诊科与青少年进行保密谈话的因素:一项多中心定性分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;30(2):99-109. doi: 10.1111/acem.14638. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Implementation of a peer-delivered opioid overdose response initiative in New York City emergency departments: Insight from multi-stakeholder qualitative interviews.在纽约市急诊科实施同伴提供的阿片类药物过量应对倡议:多利益相关方定性访谈的见解
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209542. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209542. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Implementing Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员对在初级保健中实施患者可访问电子健康记录的看法:定性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 6;13:e64982. doi: 10.2196/64982.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among Black women in the United States: insights from conducting public health research within emergency department setting.提高美国黑人女性的暴露前预防措施使用率:在急诊科环境中开展公共卫生研究的见解
Front Sociol. 2025 Aug 15;10:1613227. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1613227. eCollection 2025.
2
The Design Process of a Digital Patient Decision Tool to Increase Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing in the Emergency Department.一种用于增加急诊科性传播感染检测的数字患者决策工具的设计过程。
Sex Transm Dis. 2025 Aug 1;52(8):462-469. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002166. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Practitioner experiences of developing and implementing two UK ED-based hospital violence intervention programmes: a process evaluation.
英国两家基于急诊科的医院暴力干预项目的开发与实施的从业者经验:一项过程评估
Emerg Med J. 2025 Jul 22;42(8):536-541. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214333.