Ten Haaft Britte H E A, Montorsi Roberto M, Barsom Esther, Kazemier Geert, Schijven Marlies P, Besselink Marc G
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7064-7072. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11307-7. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Online video consultation (OVC) is increasingly used in patient-surgeon pre-surgical and follow-up consultation but a comprehensive review assessing its benefits and downsides as compared to face-to-face (F2F) consultation is currently lacking. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of OVC as compared to F2F consultation.
A literature search (Ovid/Medline, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted including studies comparing efficacy, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and information recall between OVC and F2F patient-surgeon consultation (inception-December 4, 2023).
Out of 1021 studies, 14 studies with 13,564 patients met the eligibility criteria, consisting of seven RCTs, three prospective, and four retrospective studies. Various types of surgical consultations were evaluated, including new referrals, routine follow-ups, postoperative follow-ups, and mixed consultations (both pre- and postoperative). None of the randomized trials exclusively compared OVC with F2F consultations in the high-demand preoperative setting, or assessed patient information recall. Efficacy outcomes were reported by seven studies. Among these, three RCTs showed that OVC improved efficacy in terms of waiting time (8.2 vs. 20.7 min, P = 0.01) and total appointment time (24 vs 71 min, P = 0.001, and 21.9 vs. 154.8 min, P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was reported by 10 studies. Regarding patient satisfaction, one "mixed design" study favoured OVC (92% vs. 63%, P = 0.04), while eight studies reported similar outcomes.
This systematic review identified some benefits of OVC such as shorter waiting and total appointment times as compared to F2F patient-surgeon consultation, although the true value of OVC remains unknown due to the limited available evidence. Future pragmatic RCTs are needed, which should include the pre-surgical consultation and assess patient information recall.
在线视频咨询(OVC)越来越多地用于患者与外科医生的术前及随访咨询,但目前缺乏一项全面评估其与面对面(F2F)咨询相比的利弊的综述。本系统评价评估了OVC与F2F咨询相比的有效性。
进行文献检索(Ovid/Medline、Embase和Clarivate Analytics/科学引文索引核心合集),纳入比较OVC与F2F患者-外科医生咨询之间的疗效、患者和外科医生满意度以及信息回忆情况的研究(起始时间至2023年12月4日)。
在1021项研究中,14项研究共13564例患者符合纳入标准,包括7项随机对照试验、3项前瞻性研究和4项回顾性研究。评估了各种类型的外科咨询,包括新转诊、常规随访、术后随访和混合咨询(术前和术后均有)。没有一项随机试验专门在高需求的术前环境中将OVC与F2F咨询进行比较,也没有评估患者信息回忆情况。7项研究报告了疗效结果。其中,3项随机对照试验表明,OVC在等待时间(8.2分钟对20.7分钟,P = 0.01)和总预约时间(24分钟对71分钟,P = 0.001,以及21.9分钟对154.8分钟,P = 0.001)方面提高了疗效。10项研究报告了患者满意度。关于患者满意度,一项“混合设计”研究支持OVC(92%对63%,P = 0.04),而8项研究报告了相似的结果。
本系统评价确定了OVC的一些益处,例如与F2F患者-外科医生咨询相比等待时间和总预约时间更短,尽管由于现有证据有限,OVC的真正价值仍然未知。未来需要开展务实的随机对照试验,应包括术前咨询并评估患者信息回忆情况。