Ben-Ami Shlomit, Buaron Batel, Yaron Ori, Keane Kyle, Sun Virginia H, Phillips Flip, Friedman Jason, Sinha Pawan, Mukamel Roy
Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan;53(1):325-340. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01628-2. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Previous studies have demonstrated that engaging in graphomotor activity for creating graphemes can enhance their subsequent visual discrimination. This suggests a positive influence of the motor system on visual learning. However, existing studies have emphasized the dominant hand, which is superiorly dexterous in fine-motor movements. This near-exclusive focus prompts the inquiry of whether the observed perceptual facilitation is a general characteristic of the motor system, or specific to pathways controlling the skilled over-trained dominant hand. Furthermore, the mechanistic underpinning of visual facilitation from graphomotor training (i.e., the individual contribution of motor activity, temporal evolution of the visual trace, variability of visual output) remain unclear. To address these questions, we assessed visual discrimination capabilities of healthy right-handed participants (N = 60) before and after graphomotor or visual training. Contrary to our initial expectation, graphomotor engagement with the non-dominant hand did not yield additional benefits to visual learning beyond those attainable through visual training alone. Moreover, graphomotor training with the non-dominant hand resulted in visual discrimination improvements comparable to those of dominant hand training, despite the inherent differences between hands in motor performance and in the amount of improvement in shape tracing throughout training. We conclude that the motor components of graphomotor activity may not be critical for visual learning of shapes through tracing activity. Instead, our results are in agreement with the symbolic theoretical account, suggesting that basic shape features required for discrimination can be acquired through visual inspection alone, providing a perspective on the improvements observed in prior studies.
先前的研究表明,进行书写运动活动以创造字形可以增强随后的视觉辨别能力。这表明运动系统对视觉学习有积极影响。然而,现有研究强调的是优势手,其在精细运动中更加灵巧。这种几乎排他性的关注引发了一个问题,即观察到的知觉促进是运动系统的一般特征,还是特定于控制熟练的过度训练的优势手的通路。此外,书写运动训练对视觉促进的机制基础(即运动活动的个体贡献、视觉痕迹的时间演变、视觉输出的变异性)仍不清楚。为了解决这些问题,我们评估了健康右利手参与者(N = 60)在书写运动或视觉训练前后的视觉辨别能力。与我们最初的预期相反,用非优势手进行书写运动对视觉学习并没有产生超出仅通过视觉训练所能获得的额外益处。此外,用非优势手进行书写运动训练所带来的视觉辨别能力的提高与用优势手训练相当,尽管双手在运动表现以及整个训练过程中形状追踪的改善程度方面存在固有差异。我们得出结论,书写运动活动的运动成分对于通过追踪活动进行形状的视觉学习可能并不关键。相反,我们的结果与符号理论观点一致,表明辨别所需的基本形状特征仅通过视觉检查就可以获得,这为先前研究中观察到的改善提供了一个视角。