Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75651-3.
The Stroop task was used to investigate differences in cognitive function between Long COVID (LC), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and healthy control subjects.
Subjects viewed four color words or neutral (XXXX) stimuli with the same (congruent) or different color ink (incongruent). Cognitive conflict was inferred from response times for pairings of prestimuli and subsequent stimuli. Overall effects were assessed by univariate analysis with time courses determined for binned response times.
LC and ME/CFS had significantly longer response times than controls indicating cognitive dysfunction. Initial response times were ranked LC > ME > HC, and decreased according to power functions. At the end of the task (900s), times were ranked LC = ME > HC. Response times were significantly slower for stimuli following an incongruent prestimulus. Time series for Stroop effect, facilitation, interference, surprise index and practice power law parameters were generally similar in LC, ME/CFS and HC suggesting comparable patterns for recruitment of cognitive resources. The prestimulus data were analyzed and generated positive Stroop and interference effects that were distinct from stimulus effects.
LC and ME/CFS have global slowing of response times that cannot be overcome by practice suggesting impaired communications between network nodes during problem solving. Analysis of matched prestimulus - stimulus effects adds a new dimension for understanding cognitive conflict.
Cognitive dysfunction in Long COVID and ME/CFS was demonstrated using the Stroop task which found global slowing of response times and limitations of practice effects.
采用 Stroop 任务比较长新冠(LC)、肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)和健康对照受试者之间的认知功能差异。
受试者观看四个颜色词或中性(XXXX)刺激,颜色与墨迹(一致)或不同(不一致)。根据刺激前和后续刺激的配对反应时间推断认知冲突。采用单变量分析评估整体效应,并确定分箱反应时间的时间进程。
LC 和 ME/CFS 的反应时间明显长于对照组,表明存在认知功能障碍。初始反应时间的排序为 LC>ME>HC,并呈幂函数递减。在任务结束时(900s),排序为 LC=ME>HC。紧随不一致刺激后的刺激反应时间明显较慢。LC、ME/CFS 和 HC 的 Stroop 效应、易化、干扰、惊喜指数和练习幂律参数的时间序列总体相似,提示认知资源的招募模式相似。对刺激前数据进行分析,产生了积极的 Stroop 效应和干扰效应,与刺激效应明显不同。
LC 和 ME/CFS 的反应时间整体变慢,无法通过练习克服,表明在解决问题过程中网络节点之间的通讯受损。对匹配的刺激前-刺激效应的分析增加了理解认知冲突的新维度。
采用 Stroop 任务证明长新冠和肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征存在认知功能障碍,表现为反应时间整体变慢,练习效应有限。