Reynolds W M, Stark K D
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1986 Mar;14(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00917218.
This investigation consisted of a multimethod evaluation of treatment outcome measures that have been developed to assess self-control in children. Subjects were 132 children from the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades. Each child's homeroom teacher and one other classroom teacher independently completed the Self-Control Rating Scale (SCRS), the Teacher's Self-Control Rating Scale (TSCRS), and the 10-item Conners Teacher Rating Scale (TRS). Parents of 41 children completed the Teacher's Self-Control Rating Scale and the Conners Teacher Rating Scale. Children completed the Children's Perceived Self-Control Scale (CPSC) and were administered the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFF). Results showed high internal consistency reliability for the TSCRS, SCRS, TRS, and MFF latency scores. CPSCS and MFF error scores demonstrated low reliability (r alpha's = .58 and .61, respectively). Interrater reliability between teachers was considered acceptable for the TSCRS but not for the SCRS and TRS. Correlations between teacher and parent ratings on the TSCRS and TRS were low (r's = .37 to .50). Correlations between children's latency scores on the MFF and teachers and parent ratings were very low, r's = .01 to .19, as was the correlation with children's self-ratings on the CPSCS (r = .07). Correlations between rating scales and MFF error scores also were low. The findings suggest that considerable construct confusion does exist between measures designed to assess self-control and impulsivity in children.
本调查包括对已开发用于评估儿童自我控制能力的治疗结果测量方法进行多方法评估。研究对象为132名四、五、六年级的儿童。每个孩子的班主任和另一位任课教师独立完成了自我控制评定量表（SCRS）、教师自我控制评定量表（TSCRS）和10项康纳斯教师评定量表（TRS）。41名儿童的家长完成了教师自我控制评定量表和康纳斯教师评定量表。孩子们完成了儿童自我感知控制量表（CPSC）并接受了匹配熟悉图形测试（MFF）。结果显示，TSCRS、SCRS、TRS和MFF潜伏期得分具有较高的内部一致性信度。CPSCS和MFF错误得分的信度较低（α系数分别为0.58和0.61）。教师之间的评分者信度对于TSCRS来说被认为是可接受的，但对于SCRS和TRS则不然。教师和家长在TSCRS和TRS上的评分之间的相关性较低（相关系数r为0.37至0.50）。儿童在MFF上的潜伏期得分与教师和家长评分之间的相关性非常低，相关系数r为0.01至0.19，与儿童在CPSCS上的自我评分的相关性也很低（r = 0.07）。评定量表与MFF错误得分之间的相关性也很低。研究结果表明，在旨在评估儿童自我控制和冲动性的测量方法之间确实存在相当大的结构混淆。
