Malhotra Savita, Srivastava Shruti, Gowda Mahesh R, Sharma Nidhi, Gopalan Mohan R, Watve Vidyadhar G, Paul Imon
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Psychiatry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;66(9):829-837. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_667_24. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
This paper highlights the difficulties and lacunae in the Mental Health Care Act 2017 that hinder its implementation and use for the care and treatment of persons with mental illness in India.
An online nationwide survey, involving structured questions as well as open-ended questions, to elicit the level of implementation, experience in complying with the provisions of the Act, and level of satisfaction, of practicing psychiatrists was carried out. Responses were analyzed using appropriate statistics.
600 respondents answered the online questionnaire. A majority of psychiatrists were senior practitioners with over 10 years of experience. 92.5% respondents were dissatisfied with the MHCA, wherein 73.3% wanted it amended, and 19.2% asked for repeal. Procedural issues were deterrent for 66.5% from taking medically necessary or helpful decisions for patients. Non-implementation of the Act was a major finding. Major dissatisfaction was expressed regarding judicial over reach in admission and discharge procedures, inclusion of general hospital psychiatry units in the definition of mental health establishment, non-applicability of provisions like advance directive and nominated representative in Indian setting, and that all treatment should be covered under insurance.
The Act in its present form defies the spirit of its own objectives and is unimplementable. It needs major revisions.
本文强调了《2017年精神卫生保健法》中存在的困难和缺陷,这些问题阻碍了该法在印度用于精神疾病患者的护理和治疗。
开展了一项全国性在线调查,涉及结构化问题和开放式问题,以了解执业精神科医生的实施水平、遵守该法规定的经验以及满意度。使用适当的统计方法对回复进行分析。
600名受访者回答了在线问卷。大多数精神科医生是有超过10年经验的资深从业者。92.5%的受访者对《精神卫生保健法》不满意,其中73.3%希望对其进行修订,19.2%要求废除。程序问题阻碍了66.5%的人对患者做出医学上必要或有益的决定。该法未得到实施是一个主要发现。对于司法部门在收治和出院程序中的过度干预、将综合医院精神科纳入精神卫生机构的定义、预先指示和指定代表等规定在印度背景下不适用,以及所有治疗都应纳入保险范围等方面,人们表达了强烈不满。
现行形式的该法违背了其自身目标的精神,无法实施。它需要进行重大修订。