Srivastava Shruti, Sharma Indira
Department of Psychiatry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
Emeritus Professor (Psychiatry), National Academy of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jul-Dec;33(2):239-244. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
The Mental Health Care Act, 2017 (MHCA, 17) was passed through both houses of the parliament. The Indian Psychiatric Society through its Patient's Rights Task Force committee has been deliberating various rounds of discussion at levels of stakeholders, mental health professionals, and patients' perspective. However, a scarce budget for mental health services, lack of trained mental health professionals, and poor infrastructure and logistics pose a challenge for this new act as still there is a lack of awareness of different provisions of MHCA at the administrative, judiciary, and public levels.
The present study was undertaken to address the perspectives of psychiatrists related to MHCA,2017 its provisions.
A self-administered questionnaire was designed to gather information on awareness about MHCA, 2017. The responses were collected from the member psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society in a google form including the suggestions regarding amendments in MHCA, 2017.
22.6% of participants were using MHCA in clinical practice completely, and 20.2% did not use it all. 52.4% stated that they are using it partly. Capacity assessment of the person suffering from mental illness was done by 52.4% of participants in day-to-day clinical practice. 35.7% denied assessing it. With respect to section 309 IPC, 31% were registering and managing suicide attempts as medico legal cases and 63.1% as non-MLC cases. 54.2% of the participants were not aware about medical insurance for mental health. The qualitative data suggest the act should be simplified including relaxation in provisions of minor, capacity assessment and ensure active functioning of various authorities.
Amendments are required in MHCA, 2017 taking into cognizance the opinions from various practicing psychiatrists who are facing hurdles in routine clinical practice.
《2017年精神卫生保健法》(MHCA,17)已在议会两院获得通过。印度精神病学会通过其患者权利特别工作组委员会,在利益相关者、精神卫生专业人员以及患者层面进行了多轮讨论。然而,精神卫生服务预算短缺、缺乏训练有素的精神卫生专业人员以及基础设施和后勤条件差,给这项新法案带来了挑战,因为在行政、司法和公众层面,对MHCA的不同条款仍缺乏认识。
本研究旨在探讨精神科医生对《2017年精神卫生保健法》及其条款的看法。
设计了一份自填式问卷,以收集有关对《2017年精神卫生保健法》认识的信息。通过谷歌表格从印度精神病学会的会员精神科医生那里收集回复,包括关于《2017年精神卫生保健法》修正案的建议。
22.6%的参与者在临床实践中完全使用MHCA,20.2%的参与者根本不使用。52.4%的参与者表示他们部分使用。52.4%的参与者在日常临床实践中对患有精神疾病的人进行了能力评估。35.7%的参与者否认进行评估。关于《印度刑法典》第309条,31%的参与者将自杀未遂作为法医学案件进行登记和处理,63.1%的参与者将其作为非法医学案件处理。54.2%的参与者不知道精神卫生医疗保险。定性数据表明,该法案应简化,包括放宽对未成年人的规定、能力评估,并确保各机构积极运作。
鉴于在日常临床实践中面临障碍的各执业精神科医生的意见,《2017年精神卫生保健法》需要进行修正。