• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用IFASIS(影响成功实施与维持的因素清单)提升针对具体情境且具有普遍适用性的实施决定因素知识:数字应急管理平台的案例研究

Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to Advance Context-Specific and Generalizable Knowledge of Implementation Determinants: Case Study of a Digital Contingency Management Platform.

作者信息

Jakubowski Andrea, Patrick Briana, DiClemente-Bosco Kira, Salino Sarah, Scott Kelli, Becker Sara

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center.

Stanford University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Oct 21:rs.3.rs-4912858. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4912858/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4912858/v1
PMID:39502779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11537345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contingency management (CM) is the most effective treatment for stimulant use disorder but is underutilized by opioid treatment programs (OTPs), despite the high prevalence of stimulant use in this setting. As part of a state-wide initiative, we piloted a novel assessment, the Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS), to examine determinants of implementation of a digital CM platform across a set of OTPs. We describe how the IFASIS was used to elucidate both generalizable and context-specific implementation determinants, and to guide the provision of implementation facilitation.

METHODS

Six OTPs received a multi-level implementation strategy (including facilitation) to promote programmatic uptake of a digital CM platform. Pre-implementation, OTPs completed the IFASIS, a 27-item questionnaire that assesses both the valence (positive/negative) and importance of determinants across 4 domains: outside the organization, within the organization, about the intervention, and about intervention recipients. OTP staff completed the IFASIS as a team, identifying consensus ratings during recorded discussions. Transcripts of IFASIS recordings were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Quantitative IFASIS results were aggregated into medians and ranges within and across organizations. Implementation facilitation meeting notes were analyzed to examine how the IFASIS was used to guide facilitation.

RESULTS

Quantitative ratings and qualitative feedback revealed common barriers to implementation of the digital CM platform, including a lack of sustainable funding sources, absence of external and organizational policies, insufficient higher-level leadership support, and mixed attitudes among staff members toward CM. Common implementation facilitators included enthusiasm and commitment among organization leadership and the perception that the digital CM platform would reduce the workload and burden on OTP counselors. The IFASIS was used to guide facilitation in several ways, including stimulating discussion about barriers and facilitators, brainstorming strategies to address barriers rated as "very important", and identifying facilitators that could be harnessed as part of implementation efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

The IFASIS identified important determinants of CM implementation in OTPs and was instrumental in shaping facilitation. The IFASIS may be a valuable assessment for the implementation science community to identify and address generalizable and context-specific implementation determinants.

摘要

背景

应急管理(CM)是治疗兴奋剂使用障碍最有效的方法,但尽管在阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)中兴奋剂使用很普遍,但该方法在这些项目中的应用却未得到充分利用。作为一项全州范围倡议的一部分,我们试点了一项新的评估,即影响成功实施与维持的因素清单(IFASIS),以研究在一系列OTP中实施数字CM平台的决定因素。我们描述了IFASIS如何用于阐明可推广的和特定情境的实施决定因素,并指导实施促进工作。

方法

六个OTP接受了多层次的实施策略(包括促进措施),以推动数字CM平台在项目中的采用。在实施前,OTP完成了IFASIS,这是一份包含27个条目的问卷,评估四个领域中决定因素的效价(积极/消极)和重要性:组织外部、组织内部、关于干预措施以及关于干预接受者。OTP工作人员以团队形式完成IFASIS,在记录的讨论中确定共识评级。使用快速定性分析方法对IFASIS记录的文字记录进行分析。将IFASIS的定量结果汇总为各组织内部和之间的中位数及范围。对实施促进会议记录进行分析,以研究IFASIS如何用于指导促进工作。

结果

定量评级和定性反馈揭示了数字CM平台实施的常见障碍,包括缺乏可持续的资金来源、缺乏外部和组织政策、高层领导支持不足以及工作人员对CM的态度不一。常见的实施促进因素包括组织领导层的热情和承诺,以及认为数字CM平台将减轻OTP咨询师的工作量和负担。IFASIS通过多种方式用于指导促进工作,包括激发关于障碍和促进因素的讨论、集思广益解决被评为“非常重要”的障碍的策略,以及确定可作为实施工作一部分加以利用的促进因素。

结论

IFASIS确定了OTP中CM实施的重要决定因素,并在塑造促进措施方面发挥了作用。IFASIS可能是实施科学领域用于识别和解决可推广的和特定情境的实施决定因素的一项有价值的评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fd/11537345/3f442f617d8f/nihpp-rs4912858v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fd/11537345/3f442f617d8f/nihpp-rs4912858v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fd/11537345/3f442f617d8f/nihpp-rs4912858v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to Advance Context-Specific and Generalizable Knowledge of Implementation Determinants: Case Study of a Digital Contingency Management Platform.利用IFASIS(影响成功实施与维持的因素清单)提升针对具体情境且具有普遍适用性的实施决定因素知识:数字应急管理平台的案例研究
Res Sq. 2024 Oct 21:rs.3.rs-4912858. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4912858/v1.
2
Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to advance context-specific and generalizable knowledge of implementation determinants: case study of a digital contingency management platform.运用IFASIS(影响成功实施与维持的因素清单)增进对实施决定因素的特定情境及可推广知识:数字应急管理平台的案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 7;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00708-x.
3
Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of context at the organizational level: The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS).组织层面实用情境测量方法的开发与验证:影响成功实施与维持的因素量表(IFASIS)
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 25;6(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00726-9.
4
Sustainment of Contingency Management within Opioid Treatment Programs: COVID-Related Barriers and Innovative Workflow Adaptations.阿片类药物治疗项目中应急管理的维持:与新冠疫情相关的障碍及创新工作流程调整
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2021 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2021.100003. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Pharmacy-based methadone treatment in the US: views of pharmacists and opioid treatment program staff.美国基于药房的美沙酮治疗:药剂师和阿片类药物治疗计划工作人员的观点。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Sep 11;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00563-w.
6
Implementation support for contingency management: preferences of opioid treatment program leaders and staff.应急管理的实施支持:阿片类药物治疗项目负责人及工作人员的偏好
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 30;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00149-2.
7
Implementing contingency management for stimulant use in opioid treatment programs: protocol of a type III hybrid effectiveness-stepped-wedge trial.实施阿片类药物治疗计划中兴奋剂使用的应急管理:III 型混合有效性逐步楔形试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2023 Sep 13;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01297-w.
8
Together in care: Lessons learned at the intersection of integrated care, quality improvement, and implementation practice in opioid treatment programs.共同护理:阿片类药物治疗项目中综合护理、质量改进与实施实践交叉领域的经验教训。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Nov 4;3:26334895221135265. doi: 10.1177/26334895221135265. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Identifying Contextual Factors and Strategies for Practice Facilitation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Using an Informatics-Driven Model: Framework Development and Mixed Methods Case Study.使用信息学驱动模型识别基层医疗质量改进中实践促进的背景因素和策略:框架开发与混合方法案例研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 24;9(2):e32174. doi: 10.2196/32174.
10
Experiences of three states implementing the Medicaid health home model to address opioid use disorder-Case studies in Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont.三个州实施医疗补助健康之家模式以解决阿片类药物使用障碍的经验——马里兰州、罗得岛州和佛蒙特州的案例研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Dec;83:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of context at the organizational level: The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS).组织层面实用情境测量方法的开发与验证:影响成功实施与维持的因素量表(IFASIS)
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 25;6(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00726-9.
2
Treatment Approaches for Opioid Use Disorder Offered in US Substance Use Treatment Facilities.美国物质使用治疗机构提供的阿片类物质使用障碍治疗方法。
JAMA. 2024 Aug 13;332(6):502-504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.11913.
3
Should contingency management protocols and dissemination practices be modified to accommodate rising stimulant use and harm reduction frameworks?
是否应该修改应急管理方案和传播实践,以适应不断上升的兴奋剂使用和减少伤害框架?
Addiction. 2024 Sep;119(9):1505-1514. doi: 10.1111/add.16497. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Behavior change, health, and health disparities 2023: Contingency management for treating substance use disorders and promoting health in vulnerable populations.行为改变、健康和健康差异 2023:针对弱势人群的物质使用障碍治疗和促进健康的权变管理。
Prev Med. 2023 Nov;176:107746. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107746. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Implementing contingency management for stimulant use in opioid treatment programs: protocol of a type III hybrid effectiveness-stepped-wedge trial.实施阿片类药物治疗计划中兴奋剂使用的应急管理:III 型混合有效性逐步楔形试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2023 Sep 13;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01297-w.
6
Effective, but underused: lessons learned implementing contingency management in real-world practice settings in the United States.有效,但未被充分利用:在美国现实实践环境中实施应急管理的经验教训。
Prev Med. 2023 Nov;176:107594. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107594. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
7
Polydrug use among patients on methadone medication treatment: Evidence from urine drug testing to inform patient safety.美沙酮药物治疗患者的多药物使用:尿液药物检测证据以告知患者安全。
Addiction. 2023 Aug;118(8):1549-1556. doi: 10.1111/add.16180. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Toward an era of impact of digital contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders.迈向数字应急管理对物质使用障碍治疗产生影响的时代。
Prev Med. 2023 Nov;176:107518. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107518. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
9
Dissemination of Contingency Management for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的应急管理的传播
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Feb 10;46(1):35-49. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00328-z. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
A systematic review of remotely delivered contingency management treatment for substance use.远程传递应急管理治疗物质使用的系统评价
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Apr;147:208977. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.208977. Epub 2023 Feb 13.