Coffey Alexandria M, Austin Anna, Moulton Jeremy, Engel Stephanie M, Martin Sandra L, Shanahan Meghan E
Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Dec;158:107130. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107130. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Children living in poverty are more likely to enter foster care compared to children not living in poverty. Refundable state Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs) increase household income and have been shown to reduce the risk of child maltreatment using caregiver-reported and administrative records of child protective services investigations; however, there is limited literature on the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry.
To evaluate the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry rates at the state-level.
Foster care entries among children less than 18 years old in the United States.
Difference-in-difference analyses using the Callaway and Sant'Anna approach were conducted. Data on EITC refundability was extracted from legislative records and foster care entries were obtained from Kids Count for 2000-2019. State-level policies, including Medicaid expansion, paid family leave, minimum wage, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, were included in the analysis to minimize bias from confounding.
On average, 0.5 fewer children entered foster care (95 % CI: -1.0, -0.1) per 1000 children per year among states that implemented a refundable EITC than there would have been had those states not implemented a refundable EITC. The reduction in foster care entries was not statistically significant until six years after families could first benefit from implementation of a state refundable EITC.
A refundable state EITC reduces the rate of foster care entries. This reduction is statistically significant starting six years after the tax credit is implemented in a state.
与非贫困儿童相比,生活在贫困中的儿童进入寄养机构的可能性更大。可退还的州所得税抵免(EITC)增加了家庭收入,并且已证明使用照顾者报告的儿童保护服务调查行政记录可以降低儿童受虐待的风险;然而,关于可退还的州所得税抵免对寄养机构安置的影响的文献有限。
评估可退还的州所得税抵免对州一级寄养机构安置率的影响。
美国18岁以下儿童的寄养机构安置情况。
采用Callaway和Sant'Anna方法进行差分分析。从立法记录中提取所得税抵免可退还性的数据,并从2000 - 2019年的儿童计数中获取寄养机构安置数据。分析中纳入了州一级的政策,包括医疗补助扩大、带薪家庭假、最低工资、贫困家庭临时援助和补充营养援助计划,以尽量减少混杂因素造成的偏差。
在实施可退还所得税抵免的州中,平均每年每1000名儿童进入寄养机构的人数比未实施可退还所得税抵免的州少0.5人(95%置信区间:-1.0,-0.1)。直到家庭首次从州可退还所得税抵免的实施中受益六年之后,寄养机构安置人数的减少才具有统计学意义。
可退还的州所得税抵免降低了寄养机构安置率。在一个州实施税收抵免六年之后,这种降低具有统计学意义。