• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包的可行性随机对照试验:一个预防焦虑的年轻成年人持续性脑震荡症状的直播视频项目。

Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery After Concussion: A Live Video Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms in Young Adults With Anxiety.

作者信息

Greenberg Jonathan, Levey Nadine S, Becker Molly, Yeh Gloria Y, Giacino Joseph T, Iverson Grant, Silverberg Noah D, Parker Robert A, Vranceanu Ana-Maria

机构信息

Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts.

Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr;106(4):527-536. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011
PMID:39505248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11968250/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion (TOR-C), the first mind-body program aiming to prevent persistent concussion symptoms among young adults with anxiety, and an active control (Health Enhancement after Concussion [HE-C]). We also tested preliminary improvements in outcome measures and putative mechanistic targets.

DESIGN

Single-blind, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT).

SETTING

Academic medical center in the US Northeast.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty young adults (aged 18-35 years) with a recent concussion (3-10 weeks prior) and anxiety (≥5 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7] questionnaire).

INTERVENTIONS

Both interventions consisted of four 45-minute 1:1 sessions with a clinician over Zoom. TOR-C (n=25) taught mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and return-to-activity skills. HE-C (n=25) taught health education (eg, sleep, nutrition) without skills.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: feasibility outcomes (eg, recruitment, credibility, expectancy, acceptability, safety, feasibility of assessments, fidelity, satisfaction, and TOR-C homework adherence) with a-priori-set benchmarks. Secondary: intervention outcomes were concussion symptoms (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale), physical function (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale), anxiety (GAD-7/anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), depression (depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and pain (Numerical Rating Scale). TOR-C mechanistic targets were pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), mindfulness (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised), fear avoidance (Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury), limiting behavior and all-or-nothing behavior (Behavioral Response to Illness Questionnaire).

RESULTS

Both interventions met all feasibility benchmarks and were associated with significant improvements in outcomes (concussion symptoms, physical function, anxiety, depression, and pain; d=0.44-1.21) and TOR-C mechanistic targets (pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, fear-avoidance, and limiting behavior; Cohen's d=0.41-1.24). Improvements in all-or-nothing behavior were only significant in TOR-C (d=0.52). Improvements in all mechanistic targets except all-or-nothing behavior after TOR-C were significantly associated with improvements in at least one outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide strong support for the feasibility of TOR-C and HE-C, and preliminary evidence for improvements in mechanistic targets and outcomes. Findings inform a future fully-powered RCT testing efficacy of TOR-C versus HE-C.

摘要

目的

评估脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包(TOR-C)的可行性,这是首个旨在预防伴有焦虑的年轻成年人持续性脑震荡症状的身心项目,以及一个积极对照项目(脑震荡后健康促进项目[HE-C])。我们还测试了结果指标和假定机制靶点的初步改善情况。

设计

单盲、双臂随机对照试验(RCT)。

地点

美国东北部的学术医疗中心。

参与者

50名近期(3至10周前)发生脑震荡且伴有焦虑(在广泛性焦虑障碍-7[GAD-7]问卷上得分≥5)的年轻成年人(年龄18至35岁)。

干预措施

两种干预措施均包括通过Zoom与临床医生进行四次45分钟的一对一课程。TOR-C组(n = 25)教授身心、认知行为和恢复活动技能。HE-C组(n = 25)教授健康教育(如睡眠、营养)但不教授技能。

主要结果指标

主要指标:可行性结果(如招募、可信度、预期、可接受性、安全性、评估的可行性、保真度、满意度以及TOR-C家庭作业依从性),有预先设定的基准。次要指标:干预结果包括脑震荡症状(脑震荡后症状量表)、身体功能(世界卫生组织残疾评估量表)、焦虑(GAD-7/医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑子量表)、抑郁(医院焦虑抑郁量表抑郁子量表)和疼痛(数字评定量表)。TOR-C的机制靶点包括疼痛灾难化(疼痛灾难化量表)、正念(修订后的认知与情感正念量表)、恐惧回避(创伤性脑损伤后的恐惧回避行为)、限制行为和全或无行为(疾病行为反应问卷)。

结果

两种干预措施均达到所有可行性基准,并且与结果(脑震荡症状、身体功能、焦虑、抑郁和疼痛;d = 0.44 - 1.21)以及TOR-C机制靶点(疼痛灾难化、正念、恐惧回避和限制行为;科恩d值 = 0.41 - 1.24)的显著改善相关。全或无行为的改善仅在TOR-C组中显著(d = 0.52)。除TOR-C后的全或无行为外,所有机制靶点的改善均与至少一项结果的改善显著相关。

结论

研究结果为TOR-C和HE-C的可行性提供了有力支持,并为机制靶点和结果的改善提供了初步证据。研究结果为未来一项全面测试TOR-C与HE-C疗效的RCT提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery After Concussion: A Live Video Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms in Young Adults With Anxiety.脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包的可行性随机对照试验:一个预防焦虑的年轻成年人持续性脑震荡症状的直播视频项目。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr;106(4):527-536. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
A Brief Mind-body Intervention Is Feasible and May Prevent Persistent Pain After Acute Orthopaedic Traumas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一种简明的身心干预方法可行,并可能预防急性骨科创伤后持续性疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1923-1937. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003111. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Preliminary Feasibility of a Novel Mind-Body Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms Among Young Adults With Anxiety: Nonrandomized Open Pilot Study.一种新型身心干预方案预防焦虑青年持续性脑震荡症状的初步可行性:非随机开放先导研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e64540. doi: 10.2196/64540.
4
Psychosocial Intervention and Rehabilitation Utilization Together Improve Pain and Function After Traumatic Orthopaedic Injuries: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.心理社会干预与康复利用共同改善创伤性骨科损伤后的疼痛和功能:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 4;483(8):1514-1524. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003433.
5
Concussion Outcomes 3 Months after an Intervention for Young Adults with Co-Occurring Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对同时患有焦虑症的年轻成年人进行干预3个月后的脑震荡结果:一项随机对照试验。
J Integr Complement Med. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1177/27683605251363177.
6
Feasibility of a Mind-Body Program for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对慢性疼痛的身心计划的可行性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515685. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15685.
7
"Optimizing Wellness and Neurorehabilitation with Mindfulness (OWNMindfulness)": feasibility of a novel mindfulness-based rehabilitation intervention for Persisting Symptoms after Concussion.“通过正念优化健康与神经康复(OWN正念)”:一种基于正念的新型康复干预对脑震荡后持续症状的可行性研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Nov 12:1-11. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2423783.
8
Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness.针对重度精神疾病患者创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 24;1(1):CD011464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011464.pub2.
9
Pain catastrophizing and pain anxiety mediate changes in physical function in a mind-body intervention for adults with traumatic orthopedic injuries.在一项针对创伤性骨科损伤成人的身心干预中,疼痛灾难化和疼痛焦虑介导了身体功能的变化。
Pain. 2025 Jun 1;166(6):1418-1424. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003477. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
10
Can Exposure Therapy Be Effective for Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms? A Nonconcurrent Multiple Baseline Design Across 4 Cases.暴露疗法对持续性脑震荡后症状是否有效?一项针对4个病例的非同期多重基线设计。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(4):269-278. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001023. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary Feasibility of a Novel Mind-Body Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms Among Young Adults With Anxiety: Nonrandomized Open Pilot Study.一种新型身心干预方案预防焦虑青年持续性脑震荡症状的初步可行性:非随机开放先导研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e64540. doi: 10.2196/64540.
2
Why psychological factors are still being sidelined in sport-related concussion treatment and what we can do about it.为何心理因素在与运动相关的脑震荡治疗中仍被边缘化,以及我们对此能做些什么。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 9;58(18):1032-1034. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108090.
3
A Brief Mind-body Intervention Is Feasible and May Prevent Persistent Pain After Acute Orthopaedic Traumas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一种简明的身心干预方法可行,并可能预防急性骨科创伤后持续性疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1923-1937. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003111. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
"I Wish I Had That!": A Qualitative Analysis of Psychosocial Treatment Preferences Among Young Adults With Recent Concussion and Anxiety.“要是我有那个就好了!”:一项对近期脑震荡后伴发焦虑的青年患者心理社会治疗偏好的定性分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul;105(7):1268-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.024. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
5
"I completely shut down": A mixed methods evaluation of the fear-avoidance model for young adults with a recent concussion and anxiety.“我完全崩溃了”:对近期脑震荡后伴发焦虑的青年人群中恐惧-回避模型的混合方法评估。
Rehabil Psychol. 2024 Aug;69(3):206-216. doi: 10.1037/rep0000549. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
6
Improving multimodal physical function in adults with heterogeneous chronic pain; Protocol for a multisite feasibility RCT.改善异质性慢性疼痛成人的多模态身体功能;一项多中心可行性 RCT 方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Mar;138:107462. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107462. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
7
Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Therapy on Physical Symptoms in Patients With Persistent Concussion Symptoms: A Systematic Review.非药物疗法对持续性脑震荡症状患者躯体症状的疗效:系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jul;41(13-14):1473-1493. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0474. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
"Alone in the dark": A qualitative study of treatment experiences among young adults with a recent concussion and anxiety.“独自在黑暗中”:一项针对近期脑震荡后伴发焦虑的青年患者治疗体验的定性研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2024 Jul;34(6):781-801. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2238950. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
The Impact of a Recent Concussion on College-Aged Individuals with Co-Occurring Anxiety: A Qualitative Investigation.近期脑震荡对共病焦虑的大学生的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 21;20(3):1988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031988.
10
Derivation of a minimal clinically important difference score for the WHODAS 2.0 in mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤中世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0最小临床重要差异分数的推导
NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;52(2):249-257. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220004.