• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丙泊酚、七氟醚和右美托咪定用于1至3岁儿童纤维支气管镜检查麻醉的呼吸并发症:一项随机试验]

[Respiratory complications of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children aged 1 month to 3 years: a randomized trial].

作者信息

Amir Shafa, Mohammad Montasery, Sedighe Shahhosseini, Majid Keivanfar, Asieh Maghami Mehr, Mahtab Ebrahim Babaei, Mohammad Jafari

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology.

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Sep 20;44(9):1631-1636. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.09.01.

DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.09.01
PMID:39505329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11744078/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine on respiratory complications in children undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB).

METHODS

This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted among 120 children aged 1 month to 3 years undergoing FOB. The patients were randomized into 3 groups (=40) for anesthesia induction with sevoflurane inhalation, 1 mg/kg propofol, or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine before bronchoscopy, and the changes in hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, and respiratory complications during and after the procedure were assessed.

RESULTS

The patients' heart rate during bronchoscopy was significantly lower and the mean arterial blood pressure significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group than in sevoflurane and propofol groups ( < 0.05). Cough during bronchoscopy did not occur in any of the cases in propofol group, while the highest frequency of cough was recorded in dexmedetomidine group. The incidence of laryngospasm in the propofol group (12.5%) was significantly lower than those in sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine groups (30% and 32.5%, respectively) ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane and propofol are safe and suitable for anesthesia induction in children below 3 years of age undergoing diagnostic FOB and can achieve better sedative effect and lower the incidences of cough and respiratory complications as compared with dexmedetomidine.

摘要

目的

评估丙泊酚、七氟醚和右美托咪定对接受纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)儿童呼吸并发症的影响。

方法

本双盲随机临床试验纳入120例年龄在1个月至3岁接受FOB的儿童。患者被随机分为3组(每组 = 40例),在支气管镜检查前分别通过吸入七氟醚、静脉注射1 mg/kg丙泊酚或1 μg/kg右美托咪定进行麻醉诱导,并评估术中及术后血流动力学参数、镇静水平和呼吸并发症的变化。

结果

与七氟醚组和丙泊酚组相比,右美托咪定组患者在支气管镜检查期间心率显著降低,平均动脉血压显著升高(P < 0.05)。丙泊酚组在支气管镜检查期间无一例发生咳嗽,而右美托咪定组咳嗽发生率最高。丙泊酚组喉痉挛发生率(12.5%)显著低于七氟醚组和右美托咪定组(分别为30%和32.5%)(P < 0.05)。

结论

七氟醚和丙泊酚对于3岁以下接受诊断性FOB的儿童麻醉诱导是安全且合适的,与右美托咪定相比,能获得更好的镇静效果,并降低咳嗽和呼吸并发症的发生率。

相似文献

1
[Respiratory complications of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children aged 1 month to 3 years: a randomized trial].[丙泊酚、七氟醚和右美托咪定用于1至3岁儿童纤维支气管镜检查麻醉的呼吸并发症:一项随机试验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Sep 20;44(9):1631-1636. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.09.01.
2
Effects of low-dose propofol vs ketamine on emergence cough in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.七氟醚-瑞芬太尼麻醉下儿童行纤维支气管镜检查时小剂量丙泊酚与氯胺酮对苏醒期咳嗽的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Comparison of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol or sevoflurane for hemodynamic changes during anesthesia maintenance: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.麻醉维持期间负荷剂量右美托咪定联合丙泊酚或七氟醚对血流动力学变化影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0468-x.
4
Efficacy of premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine for removal of inhaled foreign bodies in children by flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.经鼻给予右美托咪定预处理对纤维支气管镜下取出小儿吸入性异物的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0892-6.
5
Does dexmedetomidine cause less airway collapse than propofol when used for deep sedation?右美托咪定用于深度镇静时引起的气道塌陷是否比丙泊酚少?
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
6
A comparison between total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol plus remifentanil and volatile induction/ maintenance of anaesthesia using sevoflurane in children undergoing flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy.在接受可弯曲纤维支气管镜检查的儿童中,丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼全静脉麻醉与七氟醚挥发性诱导/维持麻醉的比较。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Nov;41(6):742-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100609.
7
Clinical use of dexmedetomidine as premedicant in cats undergoing propofol-sevoflurane anaesthesia.右美托咪定作为丙泊酚-七氟醚麻醉的猫术前用药的临床应用。
J Feline Med Surg. 2003 Oct;5(5):265-70. doi: 10.1016/S1098-612X(03)00053-6.
8
Effect of dexemeditomedine and propofol on the prevention of emergence agitation following sevoflurane anesthesia in Egyptian children.右美托咪定和丙泊酚对预防埃及儿童七氟醚麻醉后苏醒期躁动的作用。
J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2014 Dec;44(3):687-94. doi: 10.12816/0007872.
9
A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Cleft Palate Surgery With Sevoflurane-Based Anesthesia.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对七氟醚全麻下腭裂手术患儿苏醒期谵妄的影响比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):650-653. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008343.
10
Effects of different anesthetic regimens on postoperative cognitive function of elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.不同麻醉方案对老年开胸手术患者术后认知功能的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 27;19(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02939-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedation for bronchoscopy in children: A prospective randomized double-blinded trial.儿童支气管镜检查镇静:前瞻性随机双盲试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 May;56(5):1221-1229. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25235. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Propofol versus Fentanyl for Sedation in Pediatric Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.异丙酚与芬太尼用于小儿支气管镜镇静:一项随机对照试验。
Indian Pediatr. 2019 Dec 15;56(12):1011-1016.
3
Efficacy of premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine for removal of inhaled foreign bodies in children by flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.经鼻给予右美托咪定预处理对纤维支气管镜下取出小儿吸入性异物的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0892-6.
4
Intensivist-based deep sedation using propofol for pediatric outpatient flexible bronchoscopy.基于丙泊酚的强化深度镇静用于儿科门诊柔性支气管镜检查。
World J Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 4;6(4):179-184. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i4.179.
5
Dexmedetomidine plus sufentanil for pediatric flexible bronchoscopy: A retrospective clinical trial.右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼用于小儿可弯曲支气管镜检查:一项回顾性临床试验。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 20;8(25):41256-41264. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17169.
6
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine-propofol in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: A retrospective trial.右美托咪定-瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定-丙泊酚用于儿童可弯曲支气管镜检查的疗效比较:一项回顾性试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5815. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005815.
7
Effects of low-dose propofol vs ketamine on emergence cough in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.七氟醚-瑞芬太尼麻醉下儿童行纤维支气管镜检查时小剂量丙泊酚与氯胺酮对苏醒期咳嗽的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Comparison of the combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine to propofol or propofol/sevoflurane for drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children.右美托咪定与氯胺酮联合用药与丙泊酚或丙泊酚/七氟醚用于儿童药物诱导睡眠内镜检查的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Jul;26(7):742-51. doi: 10.1111/pan.12931. Epub 2016 May 23.
9
Anaesthesia for bronchoscopy.支气管镜检查的麻醉
Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;59(9):565-73. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.165851.
10
Utility of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy for critically ill pediatric patients: A systematic review.可弯曲纤维支气管镜在危重症儿科患者中的应用:一项系统评价。
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):77-88. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.77.