Field-Ridley Aida, Sethi Viyeka, Murthi Shweta, Nandalike Kiran, Li Su-Ting T
Aida Field-Ridley, Viyeka Sethi, Shweta Murthi, Kiran Nandalike, Su-Ting T Li, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95618, United States.
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):77-88. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.77.
To investigate the diagnostic yield, therapeutic efficacy, and rate of adverse events related to flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) in critically ill children.
We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, OVID, and EMBASE databases through July 2014 for English language publications studying FFB performed in the intensive care unit in children < 18 years old. We identified 666 studies, of which 89 full-text studies were screened for further review. Two reviewers independently determined that 27 of these studies met inclusion criteria and extracted data. We examined the diagnostic yield of FFB among upper and lower airway evaluations, as well as the utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).
We found that FFB led to a change in medical management in 28.9% (range 21.9%-69.2%) of critically ill children. The diagnostic yield of FFB was 82% (range 45.2%-100%). Infectious organisms were identified in 25.7% (17.6%-75%) of BALs performed, resulting in a change of antimicrobial management in 19.1% (range: 12.2%-75%). FFB successfully re-expanded atelectasis or removed mucus plugs in 60.3% (range: 23.8%-100%) of patients with atelectasis. Adverse events were reported in 12.9% (range: 0.5%-71.4%) of patients. The most common adverse effects of FFB were transient hypotension, hypoxia and/or bradycardia that resolved with minimal intervention, such as oxygen supplementation or removal of the bronchoscope. Serious adverse events were uncommon; 2.1% of adverse events required intervention such as bag-mask ventilation or intubation and atropine for hypoxia and bradycardia, normal saline boluses for hypotension, or lavage and suctioning for hemorrhage.
FFB is safe and effective for diagnostic and therapeutic use in critically ill pediatric patients.
探讨纤维支气管镜检查(FFB)在危重症儿童中的诊断率、治疗效果及不良事件发生率。
我们检索了截至2014年7月的PubMed、SCOPUS、OVID和EMBASE数据库,查找关于在18岁以下儿童重症监护病房进行FFB的英文研究文献。我们共识别出666项研究,其中89篇全文研究被筛选出来进行进一步审查。两名审阅者独立判定其中27项研究符合纳入标准并提取数据。我们研究了FFB在上、下气道评估中的诊断率,以及支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的效用。
我们发现FFB使28.9%(范围为21.9%-69.2%)的危重症儿童的治疗方案发生了改变。FFB的诊断率为82%(范围为45.2%-100%)。在进行的BAL中,25.7%(17.6%-75%)检测出感染性生物体,导致19.1%(范围:12.2%-75%)的抗菌治疗方案发生改变。FFB使60.3%(范围:23.8%-100%)的肺不张患者成功复张或清除了黏液栓。12.9%(范围:0.5%-71.4%)的患者报告了不良事件。FFB最常见的不良反应是短暂性低血压、低氧血症和/或心动过缓,通过最小限度的干预(如吸氧或拔出支气管镜)即可缓解。严重不良事件并不常见;2.1%的不良事件需要进行干预,如面罩通气或插管以及使用阿托品治疗低氧血症和心动过缓、使用生理盐水推注治疗低血压,或进行灌洗和吸引治疗出血。
FFB在危重症儿科患者的诊断和治疗中安全有效。