Schucht Jessica E, Rakhit Shayan, Smith Michael C, Han Jin H, Brown Joshua B, Grigorian Areg, Gondek Stephen P, Smith Jason W, Patel Mayur B, Maiga Amelia W
Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Surgery. 2025 Mar;179:108893. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.090. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Early identification of traumatic brain injury followed by timely, targeted treatment is essential. We aimed to establish the ability of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score alone and combined with vital signs to predict hospital-diagnosed traumatic brain injury.
This study included adults from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set with blunt mechanism. We calculated test characteristics of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 alone and Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate and systolic blood pressure for predicting (1) any traumatic brain injury and (2) moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Diagnostic performances were calculated in all patients and older adults (≥55 years). We used decision curve analysis to determine the net diagnostic benefit of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate + systolic blood pressure over Glasgow Coma Scale score alone.
Of 1,687,336 patients, 39.1% had any traumatic brain injury, 3.7% had moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, and 9.1% had a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12. Prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 alone had a sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 93.7%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and positive predictive value 33.7% for predicting moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Adding prehospital heart rate <65/min and systolic blood pressure >150 mm Hg to Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 improved the positive predictive value for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (55.3%), with a preserved negative predictive value of 96.4%. Decision curve analysis showed the traumatic brain injury prediction model including prehospital heart rate and systolic blood pressure had the greatest net benefit across most threshold probabilities.
Less than a third of adult blunt trauma patients with a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 have moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Supplementing Glasgow Coma Scale score with prehospital vital signs improves diagnostic accuracy, potentially by filtering out patients with altered consciousness due to shock. Future work should better identify patients for traumatic brain injury-specific treatments in prehospital settings, including triage destination.
早期识别创伤性脑损伤并及时进行针对性治疗至关重要。我们旨在确定仅依据院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分以及结合生命体征来预测医院诊断的创伤性脑损伤的能力。
本研究纳入了2017 - 2020年创伤质量改进项目数据集中具有钝性机制的成年患者。我们计算了仅院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12以及格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分结合心率和收缩压对于预测(1)任何创伤性脑损伤和(2)中度至重度创伤性脑损伤的检验特征。在所有患者及老年患者(≥55岁)中计算诊断效能。我们使用决策曲线分析来确定院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分结合心率 + 收缩压相较于单独的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的净诊断益处。
在1,687,336例患者中,39.1%有任何创伤性脑损伤,3.7%有中度至重度创伤性脑损伤,9.1%院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12。仅院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12对于预测中度至重度创伤性脑损伤的敏感性为83.1%,特异性为93.7%,阴性预测值为99.3%,阳性预测值为33.7%。在格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12的基础上,加入院前心率<65次/分钟和收缩压>150 mmHg可提高中度至重度创伤性脑损伤的阳性预测值(55.3%),阴性预测值保持在96.4%。决策曲线分析表明,包含院前心率和收缩压的创伤性脑损伤预测模型在大多数阈值概率下具有最大的净益处。
院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12的成年钝性创伤患者中,不到三分之一有中度至重度创伤性脑损伤。院前生命体征补充格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分可提高诊断准确性,可能是通过排除因休克导致意识改变的患者实现的。未来的工作应更好地在院前环境中识别适合创伤性脑损伤特异性治疗的患者,包括分诊目的地。