Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
School of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Dec;22(4):e70005. doi: 10.1002/msc.70005.
Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.
A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ, I and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).
A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.
CONCLUSION(S): Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.
髋骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的使人丧失能力的肌肉骨骼疾病。临床指南建议将关节内皮质类固醇注射(IACSI)作为一种药理学辅助手段,以帮助缓解疼痛。IACSI 通常通过超声引导(USG)或荧光透视引导(FG)进行图像引导,但没有明确的证据表明哪种引导技术更有效。本研究旨在系统地回顾科学文献,以确定 USG 与 FG-IACSIs 相比,在治疗与疼痛相关的髋 OA 患者方面的临床效果。
对从成立到 2023 年 8 月 24 日的主要文献数据库进行了系统回顾。纳入了 USG 和 FG-IACSIs 治疗髋 OA 患者的随机对照试验。主要结局测量指标为疼痛。使用随机效应模型估算的 Hedges'g 计算效应大小和荟萃分析。τ、I 和 Cochrane's Q 计算异质性。完成网络荟萃分析以间接比较效应大小。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估质量。
共确定了 1464 条引文;有 8 项研究纳入了本综述。没有研究直接比较成像方式。两项网络荟萃分析通过图像引导的髋关节注射([任何对照]、[局部麻醉或生理盐水])间接比较 USG 与 FG-IACSI,分别建立了 2.61 和 2.46 的效应大小(g),均有利于 FG-IACSI。USG 研究的异质性较低,而 FG 研究的异质性较高。
有证据表明,USG 和 FG-IACSI 都能有效降低疼痛性髋 OA 患者 1 个月时的疼痛。尽管网络荟萃分析倾向于 FG-IACSI,但仍需要高质量的试验来确定首选的引导技术。