Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75709-2.
The objective of this study was to explore the effect of different surface treatments and bonding types on elemental composition and bond strength of dentin. Under water cooling, 1.5 mm of tooth structure containing just dentin was cut from 39 extracted human molars. Dentin surfaces were untreated (control) or treated by erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet or femtosecond laser (n = 13, each). One sample from each group underwent scanning electron microscopy. Then, dentin surfaces were bonded by Clearfil SE Bond or Clearfil SE Protect (n = 6, each). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was performed both after surface treatment and bonding application. The dual-polymerized resin cement was applied to dentin surfaces with a special teflon mold (diameter:3 mm × height:3 mm). After polymerization of the resin cement, shear force was applied at the resin cement-dentin interface. Elemental composition value (weight%) of dentin after surface treatment was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the difference value in pre and post-bonding elemental composition by two-way ANOVA. Paired t-tests were executed to compare the weight% values of each element before and after each bonding application. Bond strength was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. The post-hoc test was Tukey's honest significant difference test. Both laser treatments increased the mineral content of dentin, compared to the controls (P<0.05). Application of bonding agents decreased the mineral content of dentin compared to the surface treated dentin. Bond strength was unaffected by either surface treatment or bonding type (P>0.05). For resin cementation, either surface treatment is suitable. After laser treatment, Clearfil SE Bond is recommended over Clearfil SE Protect.
本研究旨在探讨不同表面处理和粘结类型对牙本质元素组成和粘结强度的影响。在水冷条件下,从 39 颗人离体磨牙中切取 1.5mm 仅含牙本质的牙体组织。牙本质表面未经处理(对照)或用铒:钇铝石榴石激光或飞秒激光处理(n=13,每组)。每组中的一个样本进行扫描电子显微镜检查。然后,用 Clearfil SE Bond 或 Clearfil SE Protect 粘结牙本质表面(n=6,每组)。表面处理和粘结应用后均进行能量色散 X 射线光谱分析。用特殊的特氟隆模具(直径:3mm×高度:3mm)将双固化树脂粘结剂施加到牙本质表面。树脂粘结剂聚合后,在树脂粘结剂-牙本质界面施加剪切力。用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析表面处理后牙本质的元素组成值(重量%),用双向 ANOVA 分析粘结前后元素组成的差值。用配对 t 检验比较每种粘结剂应用前后各元素的重量%值。用双向 ANOVA 分析粘结强度。事后检验采用 Tukey 诚实显著差异检验。与对照组相比,两种激光处理均增加了牙本质的矿物质含量(P<0.05)。与表面处理后的牙本质相比,粘结剂的应用降低了牙本质的矿物质含量。表面处理或粘结类型对粘结强度均无影响(P>0.05)。对于树脂粘结,任何一种表面处理都是合适的。激光处理后,推荐使用 Clearfil SE Bond 而不是 Clearfil SE Protect。