Rink Johann S, Szabo Kristina, Hoyer Carolin, Saver Jeffrey L, Nour May, Audebert Heinrich J, Kunz Wolfgang G, Froelich Matthias F, Heinzl Armin, Tschalzev Andrej, Hoffmann Jens, Schoenberg Stefan O, Tollens Fabian
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16514. doi: 10.1111/ene.16514. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Investigating the cost-effectiveness of future mobile stroke unit (MSU) services with respect to local idiosyncrasies is essential for enabling large-scale implementation of MSU services. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness for varying urban German settings and modes of operation.
Costs of different operating times together with different personnel configurations were simulated. Different possible catchment zones, ischemic stroke incidence, circadian distribution, rates of alternative diagnoses, as well as missed cases were incorporated to model case coverage and patient numbers. Based on internationally reported clinical outcomes of MSUs, a 5-year Markov model was applied to analyze the cost-effectiveness for the different program setups.
Compared with standard stroke care, MSUs achieved an additional 0.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 5-year time horizon. Assuming a catchment zone of 750,000 inhabitants and 8 h/7 day operation resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €37,182 per QALY from a societal perspective and €45,104 per QALY from a healthcare perspective. Lower ICERs were possible when coverage was expanded to 16 h service on 7 days per week and larger populations. Sensitivity analyses revealed that missing ischemic strokes significantly deteriorated economic performance of MSU.
Major determinants of cost-effectiveness should be addressed when setting up novel MSU programs. Catchment zones of more than 500,000-700,000 inhabitants and operating times of at least 12-16 h per day, 7 days per week could enable the most cost-effective MSU services in the German healthcare system.
针对当地特点研究未来移动卒中单元(MSU)服务的成本效益,对于MSU服务的大规模实施至关重要。本研究的目的是评估德国不同城市环境和运营模式下的成本效益。
模拟了不同运营时间和不同人员配置的成本。纳入不同可能的服务区域、缺血性卒中发病率、昼夜分布、替代诊断率以及漏诊病例,以模拟病例覆盖范围和患者数量。基于国际上报道的MSU临床结果,应用5年马尔可夫模型分析不同项目设置的成本效益。
与标准卒中护理相比,MSU在5年时间内额外获得了0.06个质量调整生命年(QALY)。假设服务区域为75万居民,每周7天每天运营8小时,从社会角度计算,每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为37,182欧元,从医疗保健角度计算为45,104欧元。当覆盖范围扩大到每周7天每天16小时服务以及更大的人口规模时,ICER可能会更低。敏感性分析表明,漏诊缺血性卒中会显著降低MSU的经济绩效。
在设立新型MSU项目时,应考虑成本效益的主要决定因素。在德国医疗保健系统中,居民超过50万至70万的服务区域以及每周7天每天至少运营12至16小时,可能实现最具成本效益的MSU服务。