de Merbel Nico van, Gnoth Mark Jean, Wilson Amanda, Blattmann Peter, Ingelse Benno, Jordan Gregor, Fusetti Fabrizia, Blackburn Michael, Sporring Sune Hove, Love Iain, Muccio Stephane, Barfield Matthew, Wheller Rob, Timmerman Philip
ICON, Bioanalytical Laboratories, 9407, TK Assen, the Netherlands.
Bayer, DMPK, in vivo PK and bioanalytics, Bayer AG, 42096, Wuppertal, Germany.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Jan;17(2):71-77. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.
继我们最近一篇聚焦于生物治疗蛋白和生物标志物蛋白液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)生物分析持续面临的监管挑战的讨论文件之后,欧洲生物分析论坛汇报了其关于生物治疗蛋白和生物标志物蛋白在研究及监管生物分析中方法开发的内部讨论及经验。由于讨论的主题广泛,这些信息分布在两篇研究论文中,其中一篇聚焦于该技术所基于的基本原理(即是什么),另一篇则关注实际考量因素(即如何做)。在本文中,我们讨论“如何做”。这两篇论文都应有助于生物分析领域更好地理解这些挑战,并深入了解为何生物治疗蛋白和生物标志物蛋白的LC-MS/MS生物分析不应与更传统的小分子LC-MS/MS测定法或生物治疗药物的配体结合测定法相比较。