Wali Jibran A, Ni Duan, Raubenheimer David, Simpson Stephen J
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bioessays. 2025 Feb;47(2):e2400071. doi: 10.1002/bies.202400071. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
The global obesity epidemic results from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors, with diet being a prominent modifiable element driving weight gain and adiposity. Although excess intake of energetic macronutrients is implicated in causing obesity, ongoing debate centers on whether sugar or fat or both are driving the rising obesity rates. This has led to competing models of obesity such as the "Carbohydrate Insulin Model", the "Energy Balance Model", and the "Fructose Survival Hypothesis". Conflicting evidence from studies designed to focus on individual energetic macronutrients or energy rather than macronutrient mixtures underlies this disagreement. Recent research in humans and animals employing the nutritional geometry framework (NGF) emphasizes the importance of considering interactions among dietary components. Protein interacts with carbohydrates, fats, and dietary energy density to influence both calorie intake ("protein leverage") and, directly and indirectly, metabolic physiology and adiposity. Consideration of these interactions can help to reconcile different models of obesity, and potentially cast new light on obesity interventions.
全球肥胖流行是由遗传和环境因素的复杂相互作用导致的,饮食是导致体重增加和肥胖的一个突出的可改变因素。尽管过量摄入能量宏量营养素与肥胖的发生有关,但目前的争论集中在是糖、脂肪还是两者共同导致肥胖率上升。这导致了相互竞争的肥胖模型,如“碳水化合物胰岛素模型”、“能量平衡模型”和“果糖生存假说”。旨在关注个体能量宏量营养素或能量而非宏量营养素混合物的研究得出的相互矛盾的证据是这种分歧的基础。最近在人类和动物中采用营养几何学框架(NGF)的研究强调了考虑膳食成分之间相互作用的重要性。蛋白质与碳水化合物、脂肪和膳食能量密度相互作用,以影响热量摄入(“蛋白质杠杆作用”),并直接和间接地影响代谢生理学和肥胖。考虑这些相互作用有助于调和不同的肥胖模型,并可能为肥胖干预提供新的思路。