Bril Vera, Berkowicz Tomasz, Szczudlik Andrzej, Nicolle Michael W, Bednarik Josef, Hon Petr, Vaitkus Antanas, Vu Tuan, Rozsa Csilla, Magnus Tim, Panczel Gyula, Toomsoo Toomas, Pasnoor Mamatha, Mozaffar Tahseen, Freimer Miriam, Reuner Ulrike, Vécsei László, Souayah Nizar, Levine Todd, Pascuzzi Robert M, Dalakas Marinos C, Rivner Michael, Griffin Rhonda, Coll Montse Querolt, Mondou Elsa
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
III Miejskie Centrum Medyczne im, Dr Karola Jonschera w Łodzi, Lodz, Poland.
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jan;71(1):43-54. doi: 10.1002/mus.28289. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care.
Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs).
The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death.
Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.
引言/目的:目前缺乏关于静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)维持治疗重症肌无力(MG)的前瞻性、随机对照试验。在本试验中,我们评估了辛酸/层析纯化IVIG(IGIV-C)对接受标准治疗的全身型MG患者的安全性和有效性。
62例患者参加了这项2期、多中心、国际随机试验(1:1随机分组,分别接受IGIV-C[2g/kg负荷剂量;第21周前每3周1g/kg]或安慰剂)。通过比较第24周与基线时的重症肌无力定量(QMG)评分变化(主要终点)以及QMG、MG综合(MGC)和MG日常生活活动(MG-ADL)评分临床改善患者的百分比(次要终点)来评估疗效。安全性评估报告了所有不良事件(AE)。
第24周时,IGIV-C组的QMG变化为-5.1,安慰剂组为-3.1(p = 0.187)。IGIV-C组70%的患者MG-ADL有改善(降低≥2分),而安慰剂组为40.6%(p = 0.025)。QMG和MGC临床改善(降低≥3分)的患者,IGIV-C组为70.0%,安慰剂组为59.4%(p = 0.442);IGIV-C组为60.0%,安慰剂组为53.1%(p = 0.610)。IGIV-C耐受性良好;两组严重AE相似。4例需要住院治疗的MG病情加重事件中有3例发生在IGIV-C组,其中1例死亡。
几个疗效参数显示数值结果高于安慰剂组。这是一项小型研究,可能因效能不足而未观察到显著差异。可能需要进一步研究以充分确定IVIG维持治疗在MG中的疗效。