• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为意义表征中一种心理工具箱的空间。

Space as a mental toolbox in the representation of meaning.

作者信息

Zarzeczna Natalia, Bertlich Tisa, Rutjens Bastiaan T, Gerstner Ida, von Hecker Ulrich

机构信息

University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 6;11(11):240985. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240985. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.240985
PMID:39507995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11537764/
Abstract

The experience of meaning has been found to be mapped onto spatial proximity whereby coherent-in contrast to incoherent-elements in a set are mentally represented as closer together in physical space. In a series of four experiments, we show that spatial representation of coherence is malleable and can employ other meaningful concrete dimensions of space that are made salient. When given task instructions cueing verticality, participants represented coherence in the upper vertical location when making judgements about the logical validity of realistic (Experiments 1 and 4) and unrealistic syllogistic scenarios (Experiment 3). When the task instruction made the spatial proximity between the stimuli materials and the participant salient (subjective proximity), participants represented coherence as spatially close to themselves (Experiment 2). We also found that being accurate in judging the validity of syllogisms was associated with representing coherence in the upper visual field or close to oneself. Overall, our findings show that identifying semantic links between an abstract concept and a given spatial dimension involves using that dimension to create spatial metaphoric mappings of the concept.

摘要

意义体验已被发现映射到空间接近度上,即一组连贯(与不连贯相对)的元素在心理上被表征为在物理空间中彼此更接近。在一系列四项实验中,我们表明连贯性的空间表征具有可塑性,并且可以利用其他显著的有意义的具体空间维度。当给予提示垂直性的任务指令时,参与者在判断现实(实验1和4)和非现实三段论情景(实验3)的逻辑有效性时,将连贯性表征在上部垂直位置。当任务指令使刺激材料与参与者之间的空间接近度变得显著(主观接近度)时,参与者将连贯性表征为在空间上靠近自己(实验2)。我们还发现,准确判断三段论的有效性与在上部视野或靠近自己的位置表征连贯性有关。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,识别抽象概念与给定空间维度之间的语义联系涉及使用该维度来创建该概念的空间隐喻映射。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/8dcf510ae2a9/rsos.240985.f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/bbe30b833576/rsos.240985.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/bdccea6b3d0c/rsos.240985.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/5d9e9cf4138c/rsos.240985.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/7749cb03df03/rsos.240985.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/1c02610a62df/rsos.240985.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/1ad3cf8bb565/rsos.240985.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/585193cb37c8/rsos.240985.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/8b0c00974e17/rsos.240985.f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/8dcf510ae2a9/rsos.240985.f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/bbe30b833576/rsos.240985.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/bdccea6b3d0c/rsos.240985.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/5d9e9cf4138c/rsos.240985.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/7749cb03df03/rsos.240985.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/1c02610a62df/rsos.240985.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/1ad3cf8bb565/rsos.240985.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/585193cb37c8/rsos.240985.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/8b0c00974e17/rsos.240985.f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80dc/11537764/8dcf510ae2a9/rsos.240985.f009.jpg

相似文献

1
Space as a mental toolbox in the representation of meaning.作为意义表征中一种心理工具箱的空间。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 6;11(11):240985. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240985. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Spatial representation of coherence.相干性的空间表示
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):853-71. doi: 10.1037/xge0000176. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Phonological and visual distinctiveness effects in syllogistic reasoning: implications for mental models theory.三段论推理中的语音和视觉独特性效应:对心理模型理论的启示
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):759-68. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.759.
4
Exploring bias in horizontal and vertical spatial representations using mental number lines and the greyscales task.使用心理数字线和灰度任务探索水平和垂直空间表示中的偏差。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Mar;243:104115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104115. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
How logical reasoning mediates the relation between lexical quality and reading comprehension.逻辑推理如何调节词汇质量与阅读理解之间的关系。
Read Writ. 2016;29:577-590. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9613-9. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
Experiential traces first: Does holding a location in visuospatial working memory affect the processing of space-associated words?经验痕迹优先:在视空间工作记忆中保持一个位置是否会影响与空间相关的单词的处理?
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):965-983. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01512-5. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
The combination of the horizontal and vertical dimensions in mental time representation: the existence of a spatial mental map of time.心理时间表征中水平维度与垂直维度的结合:时间空间心理地图的存在。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2386-2405. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02768-4. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
8
Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation.迈向基于大脑的成分语义表征。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 May-Jun;33(3-4):130-74. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.隐含的空间意义与视觉空间偏差:概念加工对视觉目标及干扰物加工的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150928. eCollection 2016.
10
Grid-like and distance codes for representing word meaning in the human brain.网格状和距离编码在人类大脑中表示词义。
Neuroimage. 2021 May 15;232:117876. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117876. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Paper: Current Perspectives on Abstract Concepts and Future Research Directions.共识文件:抽象概念的当前观点与未来研究方向
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):62. doi: 10.5334/joc.238. eCollection 2023.
2
Multi-dimensional sensorimotor grounding of concrete and abstract categories.多维感觉运动对具体和抽象类别的基础作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210366. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0366. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
3
Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains.
心理距离对科学的预测作用:不同领域的科学怀疑论。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):18-37. doi: 10.1177/01461672221118184. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
Children gradually construct spatial representations of temporal events.儿童逐渐构建时间事件的空间表征。
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1380-1397. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13780. Epub 2022 May 13.
5
Bodily, emotional, and public sphere at the time of COVID-19. An investigation on concrete and abstract concepts.在 COVID-19 时期的身体、情感和公共领域。对具体和抽象概念的调查。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2266-2277. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01633-z. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
Abstract concepts in interaction: the need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions.互动中的抽象概念:猜测抽象概念时对他人的需求可促进二元运动互动。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jul 28;8(7):201205. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201205. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
The Spatial Ingroup Bias: Ingroup Teams Are Positioned Where Writing Starts.空间内群体偏见:内群体团队位于写作起始位置。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Jan;48(1):49-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167220984297. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
Different kinds of embodied language: A comparison between Italian and Persian languages.不同种类的身势语:意大利语和波斯语的比较。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Jul;142:105581. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105581. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Grounding of rank: embodiment, space, and magnitude.位阶的基础:体现、空间和大小。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
10
Powerful men on top: Stereotypes interact with metaphors in social categorizations.处于高位的有权势男性:刻板印象与隐喻在社会分类中的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jan;46(1):36-65. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000699. Epub 2019 Nov 7.