Bischof Thorsten, Nagele Fiona, Kalkofen Marius M, Blechschmidt Maximilian E O, Domanovits Hans, Zeitlinger Markus, Schoergenhofer Christian, Cacioppo Filippo
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department for Medicines Information and Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy of The University Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1432713. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1432713. eCollection 2024.
Polypharmacy is a growing concern in healthcare systems. While available data on potential drug-drug interactions (pDDI) from emergency department (ED) patients is derived from heterogenous populations, this study specifically focused on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that patients with AF have similar comorbidities, receive similar drugs, and have similar pDDIs. The overarching aim was to highlight frequent pDDIs, providing practical guidance for treating healthcare professionals and consequently reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions.
Two hundred patients ≥18 years with AF, who received rate- or rhythm-controlling medication at the ED of the University Hospital Vienna, and who were on long-term medication before admission, were eligible. Long-term medication alone, as well as in combination with medication administered at the ED were analyzed for pDDIs using the Lexicomp Drug interactions database.
Within the long-term medication of patients', we identified 664 pDDIs. Drugs administered at the ED increased pDDIs more than 3-fold to 2085. Approximately, every fifth patient received a contraindicated drug combination (on average 0.24 per patient), while 70% received drug combinations for which therapy modifications are recommended (on average 1.59 per patient). The most frequently involved drugs included amiodarone, propofol, bisoprolol, enoxaparin, and acetylsalicylic acid. Increased risk of bleeding, QTc prolongation, and myopathy were among the most relevant potential consequences of these interactions.
In conclusion, an optimization of medication would be advisable in almost every AF patient. Treating healthcare professionals should be cautious of drugs that increase bleeding risk, prolong QTc, or bear a risk for myopathy.
多重用药在医疗保健系统中日益受到关注。虽然来自急诊科(ED)患者的潜在药物相互作用(pDDI)的现有数据来自异质性人群,但本研究特别关注心房颤动(AF)患者。我们假设AF患者具有相似的合并症,接受相似的药物治疗,并且具有相似的pDDI。总体目标是突出常见的pDDI,为治疗医护人员提供实用指导,从而降低药物不良反应的风险。
纳入200例年龄≥18岁的AF患者,这些患者在维也纳大学医院急诊科接受了心率或心律控制药物治疗,且入院前正在接受长期药物治疗。使用Lexicomp药物相互作用数据库分析单独的长期用药以及与急诊科给予的药物联合使用的情况,以确定pDDI。
在患者的长期用药中,我们识别出664种pDDI。在急诊科给予的药物使pDDI增加了3倍多,达到2085种。大约每五分之一的患者接受了禁忌的药物组合(平均每位患者0.24种),而70%的患者接受了建议调整治疗的药物组合(平均每位患者1.59种)。最常涉及的药物包括胺碘酮、丙泊酚、比索洛尔、依诺肝素和乙酰水杨酸。出血风险增加、QTc延长和肌病是这些相互作用最相关的潜在后果。
总之,几乎每位AF患者都建议优化用药。治疗医护人员应谨慎使用增加出血风险、延长QTc或有肌病风险的药物。