Department of Health, Society and Behavior, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, 856 Health Sciences Quad, Irvine, CA, 92697-3957, USA.
Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Rd, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3064. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20557-y.
Obesity rates among children and adults continue to accelerate in the U.S., particularly among marginalized and low-income populations. Obesity prevention and reduction policies can significantly impact population health by improving environmental conditions and increasing access to health-promoting resources. Limited research has been conducted to examine state obesity policy change over time. The primary aim of this study is to examine legislative approaches used to prevent and reduce obesity in the state of California (U.S.).
We used quantitative policy surveillance methods to develop a state database of obesity-related legislation (bills, resolutions) introduced in California's legislature between 1999 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends of introduced and enacted policy by legislative and policy characteristics. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in characteristics between enacted and non-enacted legislation. Legislative session and policy characteristics found to be associated with enactment were used to predict adoption in a logistic regression.
A total of 284 obesity-related bills and resolutions were introduced in California's legislature between 1999 and 2020 with a peak of 43 in 2005-2006. On average, 25.8 bills and resolutions were introduced each 2-year legislative cycle. Findings indicate that (a) children and schools were the most frequently specified population and setting; (b) the most common policy topics were nutrition (45%) and physical activity (33%); and (c) only 15% of legislation mentioned race/ethnicity. Overall, 24.9% of bills were enacted compared to 82.1% of resolutions adopted. Legislation to raise awareness about obesity had 5.4 times the odds of being passed compared to other topics. Yet this difference was not statistically significant in a sensitivity analysis when we excluded resolutions.
This database can be leveraged to advance our knowledge of effective and equitable policy instruments to prevent and reduce obesity. Results reveal important policy elements that may impact legislative success, including policy topic, and contribute to a nascent evidence base for public health law research, legal epidemiology, and practice. Future work should investigate the role of policy effectiveness research and evidence on legislative policymaking.
在美国,儿童和成年人的肥胖率持续上升,尤其是在边缘化和低收入人群中。肥胖预防和减少政策可以通过改善环境条件和增加获得促进健康的资源,对人口健康产生重大影响。目前,关于州级肥胖政策随时间变化的研究有限。本研究的主要目的是研究美国加利福尼亚州(美国)预防和减少肥胖的立法方法。
我们使用定量政策监测方法,为加利福尼亚州立法机构在 1999 年至 2020 年期间提出的与肥胖相关的立法(法案、决议)建立了一个州数据库。使用描述性统计方法检查立法和政策特征引入和颁布政策的趋势。卡方检验用于确定已颁布和未颁布立法之间的特征差异。使用逻辑回归来预测立法会议和政策特征与通过之间的关系。
1999 年至 2020 年期间,加利福尼亚州立法机构共提出了 284 项与肥胖相关的法案和决议,2005-2006 年达到 43 项的峰值。平均而言,每两个立法周期提出 25.8 项法案和决议。研究结果表明:(a)儿童和学校是最常指定的人群和环境;(b)最常见的政策主题是营养(45%)和身体活动(33%);(c)只有 15%的立法提到了种族/族裔。总体而言,与通过的决议相比,法案的通过比例为 24.9%。与其他主题相比,提高对肥胖认识的立法通过的几率高 5.4 倍。然而,在排除决议后进行敏感性分析时,这一差异在统计学上并不显著。
本数据库可用于增进我们对预防和减少肥胖的有效和公平政策工具的认识。研究结果揭示了可能影响立法成功的重要政策要素,包括政策主题,并为公共卫生法研究、法律流行病学和实践提供了一个新兴的证据基础。未来的工作应调查政策效果研究和证据对立法决策的作用。