Jhaveri Microbiology Centre, Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, 500034, India.
Shantilal Shanghvi Cornea Institute, Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, 500034, India.
J Med Microbiol. 2024 Nov;73(11). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001924.
Melanized fungi were rarely studied for their antifungal resistance (AFR) or clinical outcome, despite rising incidence of melanized fungal ocular infections and AFR in general. We report the antifungal resistance patterns, clinical outcome and clinico-microbiological correlation in two commonly isolated melanized fungi from ocular infections, and , at a tertiary eyecare centre in South India.. Despite melanized fungi accounting for a significant proportion of ocular fungal infections in the Indian subcontinent, and despite there being a limited selection of effective antifungal agents available for these infections, the existing data and studies on these issues remain sparse. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antifungal resistance in two of the most common melanized fungal pathogens in ocular infections, and and correlate it with the treatment given and the clinical outcome in patients. Electronic medical records provided the clinical data. Standard broth microdilution was performed for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) in 30 isolates (17 . and 13 . ) for amphotericin B and natamycin (polyenes): voriconazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole (azoles) and caspofungin (echinocandin). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to more than or equal to two classes of antifungals. DNA sequencing was performed for the isolates for species confirmation. The multivariate analysis was done for determining poor prognostic factors. AFST showed highest susceptibility of study isolates for voriconazole (83.3% isolates), followed by natamycin (80%), fluconazole (80%), itraconazole (76.7%), ketoconazole (70%), posaconazole (66.7%), caspofungin (66.7%) and lastly amphotericin B (63.3%). All patients empirically received topical natamycin; additional oral ketoconazole/intraocular voriconazole was administered in select few. MDR was strongly associated with poor clinical outcome (multivariate analysis: = 0.03, odds ratio = 7.8). All patients had microbial keratitis, one progressed to endophthalmitis. Additionally, therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty was required in 40% of cases. Globe salvage was possible in 80% patients, though good visual outcome was seen in only half of them. Both, anatomical and visual outcomes, were poor in 20% of patients. DNA sequencing showed as the highest study species. and showed varying antifungal susceptibility and clinical outcome in ocular infections. Voriconazole had significantly higher activity, while amphotericin B had lower activity for these melanized fungi. MDR isolates showed poorer clinical outcome.
在印度次大陆,黑色素真菌是眼部真菌感染的主要病原体之一,且其对抗真菌药物的耐药性(AFR)不断增加,然而针对黑色素真菌的抗真菌药物耐药性模式、临床结果以及临床与微生物相关性的研究却很少。本研究报告了在印度南部的一家三级眼科中心,从眼部感染的两种常见黑色素真菌 和 中分离出的抗真菌药物耐药性模式、临床结果和临床与微生物相关性。尽管黑色素真菌在眼部真菌感染中占很大比例,而且针对这些感染的有效抗真菌药物选择有限,但关于这些问题的现有数据和研究仍然很少。因此,本研究旨在调查两种最常见的眼部感染黑色素真菌病原体 和 对抗真菌药物的耐药性,并将其与患者的治疗和临床结果相关联。电子病历提供了临床数据。对 30 株分离株(17 株 和 13 株 )进行了抗真菌药敏试验(AFST),使用标准肉汤微量稀释法检测两性霉素 B 和纳他霉素(多烯类):伏立康唑、酮康唑、泊沙康唑、伊曲康唑和氟康唑(唑类)以及卡泊芬净(棘白菌素类)。多药耐药(MDR)定义为对两种或两种以上类别的抗真菌药物耐药。对分离株进行 DNA 测序以确认种属。采用多变量分析确定不良预后因素。AFST 显示研究分离株对伏立康唑(83.3%的分离株)最敏感,其次是纳他霉素(80%)、氟康唑(80%)、伊曲康唑(76.7%)、酮康唑(70%)、泊沙康唑(66.7%)、卡泊芬净(66.7%),最后是两性霉素 B(63.3%)。所有患者均经验性地接受了局部纳他霉素治疗;在少数情况下,还额外给予口服酮康唑/眼内伏立康唑治疗。多药耐药与不良临床结果密切相关(多变量分析: = 0.03,优势比 = 7.8)。所有患者均患有微生物性角膜炎,其中 1 例进展为眼内炎。此外,40%的病例需要进行治疗性穿透性角膜移植术。80%的患者眼球得以保留,但仅有一半患者获得良好的视力结果。20%的患者解剖和视力结果均较差。DNA 测序显示 为最高研究种属。 和 在眼部感染中的抗真菌药物敏感性和临床结果存在差异。伏立康唑具有显著更高的活性,而两性霉素 B 对这些黑色素真菌的活性较低。多药耐药分离株的临床结果较差。