• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测急诊室脓毒症及高死亡风险脓毒症的 NEWS、SIRS 和 qSOFA 标准:一项基于 CETAT 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库本地数据的比较研究及改进的预测模型

NEWS, SIRS and qSOFA criteria for predicting sepsis and sepsis with high risk of death in emergency room: A comparison study and improved predictive models based on local data from CETAT and MIMIC-IV databases.

作者信息

Wang Wenwen, Wang Kaipeng, Wang Yueguo, Liu Qingyuan, Sun Jian, Shi Ronghua, Liu Sicheng, Wang Huanli, Yuan Yuan, Xu Jun, Jin Kui, Zhang Yixin

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, China.

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China.

出版信息

Biomol Biomed. 2025 May 8;25(7):1470-1478. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11134.

DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.11134
PMID:39508793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12097386/
Abstract

Early identification of sepsis in emergency department patients is critical for initiating timely interventions, highlighting the need for effective predictive scoring systems. A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the CETAT database collected between December 2019 and October 2021. The study evaluated how well the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) scoring systems, along with logistic regression models, predict sepsis, and high-risk sepsis in emergency department patients. The logistic regression models were further optimized by incorporating additional features based on local data. A total of 12,799 patients were analyzed, including 1360 sepsis cases, of which 373 were classified as high-risk sepsis. The NEWS score demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to qSOFA and SIRS, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.737 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.75) for sepsis and 0.653 (95% CI 0.62-0.69) for high risk sepsis . After optimization, the NEWS-based model improved to an AUC-ROC of 0.756 (95% CI 0.74-0.77) for sepsis and 0.718 (95% CI 0.69-0.75) for high-risk sepsis. Further enhancement was observed with the inclusion of additional clinical variables, resulting in AUC-ROC values of 0.834 (95% CI 0.82-0.85) for sepsis and 0.756 (95% CI 0.73-0.78) for high-risk sepsis. Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, which included sepsis status and relevant variables for SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS score calculations, confirmed that the optimized NEWS-based model improved the sepsis prediction AUC-ROC from 0.690 (95% CI 0.68-0.70) to 0.708 (95% CI 0.70-0.72), and consistently outperformed qSOFA and SIRS in sepsis prediction.

摘要

在急诊科患者中早期识别脓毒症对于及时开展干预措施至关重要,这凸显了有效预测评分系统的必要性。一项回顾性观察研究利用了2019年12月至2021年10月期间从CETAT数据库收集的数据。该研究评估了全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)和国家早期预警评分(NEWS)评分系统以及逻辑回归模型在预测急诊科患者脓毒症和高危脓毒症方面的效果。通过纳入基于本地数据的其他特征,对逻辑回归模型进行了进一步优化。总共分析了12799例患者,其中包括1360例脓毒症病例,其中373例被归类为高危脓毒症。与qSOFA和SIRS相比,NEWS评分显示出更好的预测性能,脓毒症的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)为0.737(95%置信区间[CI]0.72-0.75),高危脓毒症为0.653(95%CI0.62-0.69)。优化后,基于NEWS的模型在脓毒症预测方面的AUC-ROC提高到0.756(95%CI0.74-0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de79/12097386/c8e8d1c0f2c9/bb-2024-11134f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de79/12097386/8da53bf2d01d/bb-2024-11134f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de79/12097386/c8e8d1c0f2c9/bb-2024-11134f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de79/12097386/8da53bf2d01d/bb-2024-11134f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de79/12097386/c8e8d1c0f2c9/bb-2024-11134f2.jpg

相似文献

1
NEWS, SIRS and qSOFA criteria for predicting sepsis and sepsis with high risk of death in emergency room: A comparison study and improved predictive models based on local data from CETAT and MIMIC-IV databases.用于预测急诊室脓毒症及高死亡风险脓毒症的 NEWS、SIRS 和 qSOFA 标准:一项基于 CETAT 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库本地数据的比较研究及改进的预测模型
Biomol Biomed. 2025 May 8;25(7):1470-1478. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11134.
2
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
3
Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
4
Early warning scores for sepsis identification and prediction of in-hospital mortality in adults with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期预警评分在成人脓毒症中的应用:用于脓毒症识别和院内死亡率预测的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2005-2018. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17061. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
[Predictive value of norepinephrine equivalence score on the 28-day death risk in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study].去甲肾上腺素等效评分对脓毒症患者28天死亡风险的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Apr;37(4):331-336. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240413-00341.
6
Lactate-albumin ratio improves combined predictive value of qSOFA and MEWS for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.乳酸-白蛋白比值提高qSOFA和MEWS对脓毒症重症监护病房患者30天死亡率的联合预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043097.
7
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
8
Comparison of the systematic Inflammatory response syndrome and the quick sequential organ failure assessment for prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department: A systematic review.急诊科中系统性炎症反应综合征与快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估对检测脓毒症预后准确性的比较:一项系统评价
Int Emerg Nurs. 2023 Jan;66:101242. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101242. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
9
SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)及国家早期预警评分(NEWS)在脓毒症诊断及不良结局预测中的应用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(8):891-900. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2237192. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021: highlights for the practicing clinician.2021 拯救脓毒症运动指南:临床医生实用要点。
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022 Aug 22;132(7-8). doi: 10.20452/pamw.16290. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Combination of Prehospital NT-proBNP with qSOFA and NEWS to Predict Sepsis and Sepsis-Related Mortality.联合院前 NT-proBNP 与 qSOFA 和 NEWS 预测脓毒症和脓毒症相关死亡率。
Dis Markers. 2022 Feb 23;2022:5351137. doi: 10.1155/2022/5351137. eCollection 2022.
3
A 2-year retrospective analysis of the prognostic value of MqSOFA compared to lactate, NEWS and qSOFA in patients with sepsis.
一项对脓毒症患者 MqSOFA 与乳酸、NEWS 和 qSOFA 预后价值的 2 年回顾性分析。
Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):941-948. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01768-0. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
5
Comparison of qSOFA, SIRS, and NEWS scoring systems for diagnosis, mortality, and morbidity of sepsis in emergency department.比较 qSOFA、SIRS 和 NEWS 评分系统在急诊科脓毒症的诊断、死亡率和发病率中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
The utility of the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) compared with SIRS, qSOFA and NEWS for Predicting in-hospital Mortality among Patients with suspicion of Sepsis in an emergency department.快速急诊医学评分(REMS)与 SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 相比,在预测急诊科疑似脓毒症患者住院死亡率方面的效用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00396-x.
7
Prognostic accuracy of SOFA score, SIRS criteria, NEWS and MEWS scores for in-hospital mortality among adults admitted to ICU with suspected sepsis.对于疑似脓毒症入住重症监护病房的成年人,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准、国家早期预警评分(NEWS)和改良早期预警评分(MEWS)对院内死亡率的预测准确性。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2020 Jan;68(1):87.
8
Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score.预测急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的死亡率:一项比较 qSOFA、SIRS 和国家早期预警评分的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211133. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency Department.比较 SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 在急诊科早期识别脓毒症中的作用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1490-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.058. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? Clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU.全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)还是快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)?这是问题所在吗?一项关于 ICU 外疑似脓毒症患者预后预测的荟萃分析和批判性评价的临床和方法学观察。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15.