• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阵容规模对可辨别性的影响取决于填充项的相似性,且与编码强度无关。

The effect of lineup size on discriminability is dependent on filler similarity and independent of encoding strength.

作者信息

Lam Allan L, Wixted John T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1272-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01649-x. Epub 2024 Nov 7.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01649-x
PMID:39509017
Abstract

A photo lineup, which consists of one suspect and several physically similar fillers, is often used by the police to test an eyewitness's memory. To optimize memory performance, how similar should the fillers be to the suspect, and how many fillers should be included in the lineup? Recent work suggests that using fillers who match the basic characteristics of the perpetrator (e.g., same age, race, and gender) but who are otherwise maximally dissimilar to the suspect optimizes discriminability. However, the optimal lineup size has been found to vary with filler similarity, with larger lineup sizes increasing or decreasing discriminability depending on whether low-similarity or high-similarity fillers were used, respectively. Because manipulating filler similarity at retrieval affects overall performance, here we investigated whether encoding manipulations that affect overall performance also affect how lineup size influences discriminability. In three experiments, we first replicated prior findings (N = 502), then reduced encoding strength by making study images blurry when low-similarity fillers were used (N = 553), and finally increased encoding strength by repeating study images when high-similarity fillers were used (N = 501). We found that whether overall performance was low or high due these encoding manipulations, discriminability still increased as a function of lineup size when low-similarity fillers were used and decreased as a function of lineup size when high-similarity fillers were used. Thus, lineup size has opposing effects on discriminability when task difficulty is manipulated at retrieval, which narrows the theoretical explanations for why that effect is observed.

摘要

照片列队辨认,由一名嫌疑人及几名外貌相似的陪衬人员组成,警方常使用它来测试目击者的记忆力。为了优化记忆表现,陪衬人员应与嫌疑人多相似,列队中应包含多少陪衬人员呢?近期研究表明,使用与犯罪者基本特征相符(如年龄、种族和性别相同)但在其他方面与嫌疑人差异最大的陪衬人员,可优化辨别能力。然而,已发现最佳列队规模会随陪衬人员相似度而变化,列队规模越大,辨别能力是增强还是减弱,分别取决于使用的是低相似度还是高相似度的陪衬人员。由于在提取时操纵陪衬人员相似度会影响整体表现,所以我们在此研究了影响整体表现的编码操纵是否也会影响列队规模对辨别能力的影响。在三项实验中,我们首先重复了先前的研究结果(N = 502),然后在使用低相似度陪衬人员时通过使研究图像模糊来降低编码强度(N = 553),最后在使用高相似度陪衬人员时通过重复研究图像来提高编码强度(N = 501)。我们发现,无论这些编码操纵导致整体表现是低还是高,当使用低相似度陪衬人员时,辨别能力仍会随列队规模增大而增强,而当使用高相似度陪衬人员时,辨别能力会随列队规模增大而减弱。因此,当在提取时操纵任务难度时,列队规模对辨别能力有相反的影响,这缩小了对为何会观察到这种影响的理论解释范围。

相似文献

1
The effect of lineup size on discriminability is dependent on filler similarity and independent of encoding strength.阵容规模对可辨别性的影响取决于填充项的相似性,且与编码强度无关。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1272-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01649-x. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification.填充物相似性和阵容大小对目击者识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Sep;50(9):1444-1462. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001342. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Modeling face similarity in police lineups.模拟警察列队中的面孔相似性。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;130(2):432-461. doi: 10.1037/rev0000408. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.优化警察列队辨认中选择陪衬人的策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017292118.
5
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观测量方法来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似性对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Oct 22;7(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00442-1.
6
Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.怀疑目击证人列队辨认中的填充物相似性:文献综述与新方法
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000095. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.单一列队范式:一种在目击者识别实验中操纵目标存在的新方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000272.
8
A rate-them-all lineup procedure increases information but reduces discriminability.一种对所有选项进行评分的排列程序增加了信息量,但降低了辨别力。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2025 Mar;31(1):1-11. doi: 10.1037/xap0000524. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
9
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观指标来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似度对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Nov 6;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00522-w.
10
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Involuntary and voluntary processes compete for entering the focus of attention of working memory.非自主和自主过程竞相进入工作记忆的注意力焦点。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Mar;51(3):337-349. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001374. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
On the advantages of using AI-generated images of filler faces for creating fair lineups.利用 AI 生成的填充物人脸图像创建公平的列队的优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63004-z.
3
The relationship between ensemble coding and individual representation of crowd facial emotion.
人群面部表情的整体编码与个体表现之间的关系。
Biol Psychol. 2023 May;180:108593. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108593. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
A population response model of ensemble perception.一种整体感知的群体反应模型。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Jan;131(1):36-57. doi: 10.1037/rev0000426. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Modeling face similarity in police lineups.模拟警察列队中的面孔相似性。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;130(2):432-461. doi: 10.1037/rev0000408. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.人数大小对目击证人辨认的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Jun;27(2):369-392. doi: 10.1037/xap0000340. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.收集和保存目击证人辨认证据的政策和程序建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;44(1):3-36. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000359.
8
Is this my group or not? The role of ensemble coding of emotional expressions in group categorization.这是我的小组吗?情绪表达的整体编码在群体分类中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):445-460. doi: 10.1037/xge0000651. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Models of lineup memory.列队记忆模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep;105:81-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jul 19.