Tompkins Virginia, Montgomery Derek E, Dore Rebecca A, Lee Bridget Kiger
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Lima.
Department of Psychology, Bradley University.
Dev Psychol. 2025 Jun;61(6):1112-1125. doi: 10.1037/dev0001869. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Researchers argue that theory of mind (ToM) abilities are needed for text (listening or reading) comprehension. Although many studies have supported this claim, findings are mixed and researchers have disagreed on how fundamental this relation is-for example, whether ToM and text comprehension are related merely because of shared variance with verbal and executive function skills. To address these issues more definitively, we conducted a meta-analysis examining ToM and text comprehension, which included 47 independent samples with 5,123 participants ranging in age from 3 to 70 years of age ( = 10.53 years). We found a statistically significant association ( = .33) between ToM and text comprehension across 157 effect sizes. This relation did not differ based on whether data were cross-sectional or longitudinal, the age of participants, or most characteristics of the ToM or comprehension tasks (e.g., the degree to which they were narrative or inferential). However, the effect size was stronger in some languages and for listening comprehension rather than reading comprehension tasks. In longitudinal designs, the effect size did not differ depending on whether ToM was assessed before text comprehension or the reverse. Finally, we conducted meta-analyses controlling for verbal and/or executive function abilities and found that the relation between ToM and text comprehension was significant when controlling for each as well as both abilities ( = .22-.32). The current findings provide the strongest evidence to date that there is a fundamental relation between ToM and text comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
研究人员认为,心理理论(ToM)能力是文本(听力或阅读)理解所必需的。尽管许多研究支持了这一观点,但研究结果参差不齐,研究人员对于这种关系的基本程度存在分歧——例如,ToM与文本理解是否仅仅因为与语言和执行功能技能的共同差异而相关。为了更明确地解决这些问题,我们进行了一项元分析,考察ToM与文本理解,该分析纳入了47个独立样本,共5123名参与者,年龄范围从3岁到70岁(平均年龄=10.53岁)。我们发现,在157个效应量中,ToM与文本理解之间存在统计学上的显著关联(r=.33)。这种关系并不因数据是横断面的还是纵向的、参与者的年龄,或者ToM或理解任务的大多数特征(例如,它们是叙事性的还是推理性的程度)而有所不同。然而,在某些语言以及听力理解任务而非阅读理解任务中,效应量更强。在纵向设计中,效应量并不因ToM是在文本理解之前还是之后进行评估而有所不同。最后,我们进行了控制语言和/或执行功能能力的元分析,发现当分别控制每种能力以及同时控制这两种能力时,ToM与文本理解之间的关系都是显著的(r=.22-.32)。目前的研究结果提供了迄今为止最有力的证据,证明ToM与文本理解之间存在基本关系。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)