Montgomery Derek E, Tompkins Virginia, Feng Xin
Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL, United States.
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University at Lima, Lima, OH, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 2;15:1435685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435685. eCollection 2024.
There are conflicting proposals about the underlying structure of the theory of mind (ToM) construct. The lack of clarity impedes attempts to understand relationships between ToM and other cognitive abilities. This study investigated the nature of the ToM construct and its relation to cognitive variables by administering a battery of ToM measurements along with measurements of executive function and general vocabulary to 207 ( = 19.26) adult participants. Associations between ToM tasks were statistically significant after controlling for covariates, but, for the most part, very weak in magnitude. The strongest relationship was between the Strange Stories and Higher-Order False Belief measurements. Previous theoretical analysis proposes those instruments are conceptually linked by a perspective taking requirement that entails representing another's mental state. Results from a factor analysis suggested an underlying ToM structure-a factor. The Strange Stories, Higher-Order False Belief, and Frith-Happé Animation tasks loaded onto the factor. Its defining feature is the ascription of mental states to predict and explain protagonists' actions that take place within a narrative structure. It is related more strongly to vocabulary than executive function and it provides grounds for future research on the role of narrative processing in ToM reasoning.
关于心理理论(ToM)结构的潜在结构存在相互矛盾的提议。缺乏清晰度阻碍了人们理解ToM与其他认知能力之间关系的尝试。本研究通过对207名(平均年龄=19.26岁)成年参与者进行一系列ToM测量以及执行功能和一般词汇测量,调查了ToM结构的性质及其与认知变量的关系。在控制协变量后,ToM任务之间的关联具有统计学意义,但在很大程度上,其强度非常弱。最强的关系存在于“奇怪故事”和高阶错误信念测量之间。先前的理论分析提出,这些工具在概念上通过一个需要呈现他人心理状态的视角采择要求相联系。因子分析的结果表明存在一种潜在的ToM结构——一个因子。“奇怪故事”、高阶错误信念和弗里思-哈佩动画任务都加载到了这个因子上。其定义特征是将心理状态归因于预测和解释在叙事结构中发生的主角行为。它与词汇的关系比与执行功能的关系更强,并且为未来关于叙事加工在ToM推理中的作用的研究提供了依据。